期刊文献+

食管-胃结合部腺癌淋巴管侵犯与相关病理学因素关系研究 被引量:4

The Relationship between Lymphatic Vessel Invasion and Other Correlative Pathologic Factors in Adenocarcinoma of the Esophago-gastric Junction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨食管-胃结合部腺癌淋巴管侵犯与相关病理学因素之间的关系。方法:对156例根治性手术切除的食管-胃结合部腺癌的病理资料进行分析,按照有无淋巴管侵犯分为两组(LV(I+)组89例,LV(I-)组67例),比较不同N分期、T分期、肿瘤大体类型、组织学类型、分化程度、肿瘤大小及淋巴结转移个数等情况下,淋巴管侵犯的发生情况(采用卡方检验,P<0.05差异具有统计学意义),并比较LV(I+)组与LV(I-)组肿瘤分化程度的差别(采用非参数Mann-WhitneyU检验)以及肿瘤大小和淋巴结转移个数的情况(采用两个独立样本的t检验,P<0.05差异具有统计学意义)。结果:1)LV(I-)组与LV(I+)组,LN(+)发生率分别为61.2%和95.5%,LV(I+)者淋巴结转移率高,差异具有统计学意义;LN(-)者与LN(+)者,LVI(+)发生率分别为13.3%和67.5%,LN(+)者发生淋巴管侵犯的几率较大,差异具有统计学意义。2)T1期均为LVI(-);T2及T3期LVI发生率无统计学差异;T4期LV(I+)者显著高于LVI(-)者。3)分化好组与分化差组的LVI发生率有统计学差异,分化差组中低分化腺癌LVI(+)明显高于LV(I-)。4)LV(I+)组平均肿瘤大小和平均淋巴结转移个数分别为(6.09+3.40)cm和(9.75+7.82)枚,LV(I-)组分别为(4.34+2.07)cm和(2.63+2.00)枚,两组间差异具有统计学意义。结论:食管-胃结合部腺癌的淋巴管侵犯发生与N分期、T分期、组织学类型、分化程度、肿瘤大小及淋巴结转移个数等多种病理学因素显著相关。 Objective: To investigate the relationship between lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) and other correlated pathologic factors in adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction. Methods: A total of 156 patients with esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma who underwent radical surgical resection were recruited and divided into two groups: the LVI-positive group and the LVI-negative group. The incidence of LVI was evaluated with the X^2 test among patients with different N stages, T stages, morphological and histological type, tumor size and the number of involved lymph nodes. The difference in tumor differentiation between the LVI (+) group and the LVI (-) group was compared by nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. The tumor size and the number of lymph nodes with metastases [LN(+)] were estimated between the LVI (+) group and the LVI (-) group using the independent samples t test. Results: (1) The incidence of LN (+) was 61.2% in the LVI (+) group and 95.5% in the LVI (-) group, with a significant difference. The incidence of LVI was 13.3% in patients with involved lymph nodes and 67.5% in patients without involved lymph nodes, with a significant difference. (2) All cases of T1 stage were LVI (-). No significant difference was found in the incidence of LVI between stages T2 and T3. Most T4 stage cases were LVI (+). (3) A statistical significance was found in the incidence of LVI between well-differentiated cases and poorly-differentiated cases. The poorly-differentiated cases were mostly LVI (+). (4) The tumor size was 6.09+3.40 cm in the LVI (+) group and 9.75+7.82 in the LVI (-) group. The number of involved lymph nodes was 4.34+2.07 in the LVI (+) group and 2.63+2.00 in the LVI (-) group. Conclusion: There is a significant correlation between LVI and N stage, T stage, the morphological and histological type, the tumor differentiation, tumor size and the number of involved lymph nodes.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第13期736-738,747,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
关键词 贲门肿瘤 食管-胃结合部癌 淋巴管侵犯 淋巴结 病理 Gastric cardiac neoplasm Carcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction Lymphatic vessel invasion Lymph node Pathology
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献66

  • 1陈峻青,王梅先,齐春莲,王舒宝,单吉贤,张文范,张荫昌.胃癌淋巴结转移及其分型的病理生物学意义[J].实用外科杂志,1989,9(9):478-480. 被引量:24
  • 2陈建华,卫功铨,刘先本,何山宏,龙志强.淋巴结阴性食管癌的预后因素[J].河南肿瘤学杂志,1995,8(2):107-108. 被引量:9
  • 3李景武,梁寒,王晓娜.814例胃癌患者的预后因素分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(7):399-402. 被引量:37
  • 4陈峻青 张文范.从胃癌的生物学行为探讨胃癌的外科治疗[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1982,:110-113.
  • 5Mattila MM, Ruohola JK, Karpanen T, et al. VEGF-C-induced lymphangiogenesis is associated with lymph node metastasis in orthotopic MCF-7 tumors. Int J Cancer, 2002,98(6):946-951.
  • 6Stacker SA, Achen MG, Jussila L, et al. Metastasis: lymphangiogenesis and cancer metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer, 2002, 2(8) :573-583.
  • 7Maula S-M, Luukkaa M, Gronman R, et al. Intratumoral lymphatic are essential for the metastatic spread and prognosis in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region. Cancer Res, 2003,63(8): 1920-1926.
  • 8Straume O, Jackson DG, Akslan LA. Independent prognostic impact of lymphatic vessel density and presence of low-grade lymphangiogenesis in cutaneous melanoma. Clin Cancer Res,2003,9(1 ):250-256.
  • 9Yokoyama Y, Sato S, Futagami M, et al. Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor in endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol,2000,77(3) :413-418..
  • 10Yonemura Y, Fushida S, Bando E, et al. Lymphangiogenesis and the vascularendothelial growth factor receptor( VEGFR)-3 in gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer, 2001,37(7) :918-923.

共引文献44

同被引文献41

  • 1吴永梅,李可.青年和老年胃癌患者的胃镜及病理特点比较分析[J].中国综合临床,2005,21(11):1020-1021. 被引量:10
  • 2Dicken B J, Graham K, Hamilton SM, et al. Lymphovascular invasion is associated with poor survival in gastric cancer: an application of gene - expression and tissue array techniques [ J ]. Ann Surg,2006,243( 1 ) :64 -73.
  • 3Ai F, Yukio I, Yufi AF, et al. Significance of lymphatic invasion on regional lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer using LYVE - 1 immunohistochemieal analysis [ J ]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2007, 127:82 - 88.
  • 4Jose MC, Maria DC, Ana A, et al. Lymphatic and/or blood vessel invasion in gastric cancer: relationship with clinicopathological parameters, biological factors and prognostic significance[ J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol,2008,134 : 153 - 161.
  • 5Katharina S, Peter B, Verena G. Prognostic value of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in neuroendocrine tumors of the lung[ J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2005,29 ( 3 ) : 324 - 328.
  • 6Chikara Kunisaki, Hirochika Makino, Hirotoshi Akiyama, et al. Clinical significance of the metastatic lymph - node ratio in early gastric cancer [ J ]. J Gastrointest Surg ,2008 ,12 : 542 - 549.
  • 7Cuenl LN, Detmar M. New insights into the molecular control of the lymphatic vascular system and its role in disease[ J]. J Invest Dermatol,2006,126(10) :2167 - 2177.
  • 8Stacker SA, Williams RA, Achen MG. Lymphangiogenenic growth factors as markers of tumor metastasis [ J ]. APMIS, 2004,112 : 539 - 549.
  • 9Abe N, Watanabe T, Sugiyama M, et al. Endoscopic treatment or surgery for undifferentiated early gastric cancer[ J] .? Am J Surg, 2004,188(2) :181 - 184.
  • 10魏丽珍,李桂霞,罗宗林,张楠,赵秀清,温登瑰,王士杰.贲门癌手术患者1007例临床及诊疗状况分析[J].中国综合临床,2007,23(10):932-933. 被引量:1

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部