期刊文献+

会话中多主体的语言信息动态认知 被引量:2

Dynamic cognition of multi-agents language information in conversation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 会话过程中多主体交流是个复杂的信息流问题。它不仅牵涉到语言方面的知识,而更多的是认知、逻辑方面的知识。动态认知逻辑着眼于从具体的会话事例出发,分析信息的产生、认知的推理、信息的更新、信念的修正等问题,从而为会话交流过程中的信息流提供结构模型、变化轨迹。这对于语言构造的分析、人的动态化认知过程、人工智能以及计算机的信息处理具有重要意义。 The communication is a complicated information flow phenomenon in conversation. In order to understand it sufficient knowledge of language, cognition, as well as, logic are needed. Dynamic-epistemic logic provides structural models and the trace of changing through analyzing information creation, cognitive reasoning, information updating and belief revision from concrete dialogue scenario. This study has importance in the analysis of language construction, artificial intelligence and computer information processing .
作者 廖德明
机构地区 西华师范大学
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第3期420-424,共5页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基金 西华师范大学校内科研启动课题资助项目(04B060)
关键词 多主体 动态认知 信息更新 multi-agents dynamic cognition information updatin
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]vall Bcnthm J.Epistemic logic and epistemology:the state of their affairs[J].Philosophical Stduies,2006,128(5):56.
  • 2[2]van Benthem J.Cognition as interaction,cognitive foundation of interpretation[J].Royal Netherlands Academy of Art and Sciences,2007,64(7):28-29.
  • 3[3]Parikh P.The Use of Language[M].Stanford:CLLI Publications,2002.
  • 4[4]van Rooy R.Signalling games select Hom strategies[J].Linguistics and Philosophy,2004,27(4):393-450.
  • 5[5]van Benthem J.Computation as Conversation[M].Stanford:CLLI Publications,2007.
  • 6[6]van Benthem J.Intelligent Interaction:Dynamic Trends in Today's Logic[M].Stanford:CLLI Publications,2007.
  • 7[7]van Benthem J.Logic and Reasoning:Do the Facts Matter[M].Stanford:CLLI Publications,2007.
  • 8[8]van Benthem J.One is a lonely number:on the logic of communication[C]//Koepke P.Colloquium Logicum.Muenster:AMS Publications,2002.
  • 9[9]Harel D,Kozen D,Tiuryn J.Dynamic Logic[M].Cambridge:the MIT Press.2000.

同被引文献15

  • 1Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance [M]. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, 1986: 192-193.
  • 2Bezuidenhout A.The Communication of De Re Thoughts [J]. Nous, XXXI, 1997: 197-225.
  • 3Carston R. Explicature and semantics [J]. Davis S, Gillon B, eds. Semantics: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 76.
  • 4Cappelen H, Lepore E. Insenstive Semantics [M]. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, 2005: 67.
  • 5Cappelen H, Lepore E. Relevance theory and shared content [J]. Burton-Roberts N, ed. Advances in Pragmatics, Palgrave Macmillian. 2006: 38.
  • 6Hawthorne J. Knowledge and Lotteries [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004: 78.
  • 7Martin, J. R. ( 1985), Process and Text : two aspects of human semiosis. Systemic Perspectives on Diseourse,Volume 1. Ed. James Benson and William Greaves. Norwood : Ablex.
  • 8Berry, M. ( 1981 ), Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. In Network 2.
  • 9Berry, M. (1981),"Systemic linguistics & discourse analysis:a multi-layered approach to exchange structure. " Studies in Discourse Analysis. Ed. M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery. London: Boston-Henly:Routledge & Kegan Paul. p120 - 145.
  • 10O'Donnell, M. (1990),"A Dynamic Model of Exchange." In M. O'Donnell, M. Matthiessen and P. Sefton,Resources in Dialogue Modelling. Research Report, Departments of Linguistics and Electrical Engineering, University of Sydney.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部