期刊文献+

论司法的高级法背景——以美国宪法为分析样本

On the Higher Law Background of Judicature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为高级司法的宪法司法是文本司法和超文本司法的统一。对宪法流动性的分析,旨在改变对美国宪法恒定性大加崇拜的传统观点,尤其是为把握司法的高级法背景、理解司法发展的规律提供知识养分。流动性是宪法司法的基本特征,个人权利与公共权力在互动中变化是宪法成长的关键。动态宪法的深刻启示在于:和谐的司法理念寻求规则框架上的动与静的完美结合,而这一结合的联结点正是最为规范的高级法和作为价值的高级法的和谐共生。 The analysis on the fluidness of constitution aims to change the traditional attitude that the invariance is the uhimate characteristic of American Constitution, especially to provide intellective nutrient for the understanding of the Higher Law background of judicature and the laws of the development of judicature, It is considered that fluidness is the basic characteristic of constitutional justice, the transformation of private rights and public powers during mutual - functioning is the key of constitutional development. The profound apocalypse of dynamic constitution is : the harmonious judicial notion seeks for the perfect combination of action and inaction within the regular framework, and the joining point of the combination is exactly the harmonious symbiosis of most normative higher law and higher law as values
作者 汪习根 陈旗
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期3-10,共8页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 宪法 流动性 动态宪法 司法 constitution fluidness dynamic constitution judicature
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1[美]爱德华·考文.美国宪法的“高级法”背景[M].强世功,译.北京:三联书店,1996:6.
  • 2Richard · H · Fallon, The Dynamic Constitution: An Introduction to American Constitutional Law, Cambridge University Press 2004.
  • 3Chief Justice Taney, In the Dred Scott Case, 19 Howard 393 (1857)
  • 4Chief Justice Marshall , In McCulloch v. Maryland , 4 Wheat 316( 1891 ).
  • 5Geoffery R. Stone and others: Constitutional Law, Little, Brown and Company, 1986.
  • 6West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, 300 U. S. 379(1937).
  • 7Archbald Cox, The Court and the Constitution, Houghton Mifflin Company 1987.
  • 8Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law. In Jurisprudence in Action. Baker, Vooris & Co. , INC. 1953.
  • 9Roscoe Pound, Do We Need a Philosophy of Law? In Jurisprudence in Action, Baker, Voorhis & Co. , INC. 1953.
  • 10《美国宪法》第1修正案.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部