摘要
把对朱自清人格的理解当成《荷塘月色》的意义,这种"外围性"的批评方法是以先在的观念取代了文本的具体分析;朱自清被包办的婚姻即使升华为爱情也不能证明《荷塘月色》表现的就不是朱自清的潜意识愿望;其他作品的意义决不等同于《荷塘月色》的意义,《荷塘月色》的意义只能来自于《荷塘月色》文本形式的具体分析。
Regards "The Lotus Pool By Moonlight" to the Zhu Zi-qing's personality understanding significance, this kind "periphery" the criticism method is at first in the idea has substituted for the text concrete study; Zhu Zi-qing's marriage which takes care, even if sublimates into love, cannot prove that " The Lotus Pool By Moonlight" displays is not Zhu Zi-qing's subconscious looks originally; Other work's significance equates in no way in "Lotus pond Moonlight" significance, " The significance of the Lotus Pool By Moonlight" can only come from " The text of the Lotus Pool By Moonlight" form concrete study.
出处
《吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
2008年第1期45-48,共4页
Journal Of Jilin Normal University:Humanities & Social Science Edition
关键词
《荷塘月色》
外围性批评
文本具体分析
美人爱欲
"The Lotus Pool By Moonlight"
Periphery criticism
Text concrete study
The beautiful wom-an loves the desire