4Edwardson K J, Bowden W B, Dahm C, et al. The hydraulic characteristics and geochemistry of hyporheic and parafluvial zones in Arctic tundra streams, north slope,Alaska[J]. Ad vances in Water Resources, 2003,26 : 907-923.
5Salehin M, Packman A I, Paradis M. Hyporheic exchange with heterogeneous streambeds: Laboratory experiments and modeling[J/OL]. Water Resources Research, 2004, 40: Wl1504, doi:10. 1029/2003WR002567.
6Sophocleous M. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: The state of the science [J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2002, 10: 52-67.
7Kalbus E, Reinstorf F, Schirmer M. Measuring methods for groundwater, surface water and their interactions: A review [J]. Hydrology and Earth Systems Sciences, 2006, 3: 1809- 1850.
8Paulsen R J, Smith C F, O'Rourke D, et al. Development and evaluation of an ultrasonic ground water seepage meter[J]. Ground Water, 2001, 39(6): 904-911.
9Landon M K, Rus D L, Harvey F E. Comparison of instream methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity in sandy stre- ambeds[J]. Ground Water, 2001, 39(6): 870-885.
10Rutledge A T. Methods of using streamflowreeords For esti- mating total and effective recharge in the Appalachian Valley and Ridge, Piedmont, and Blue Ridge physiographic provinces [J]. Water Resources, 1992, 17: 59-73.
