摘要
在20世纪五六十年代的中印边界争端中,印度政府认为,1684年条约和1842年条约是其主张的中印边界西段东半部分(西藏—拉达克边界)的条约根据。但中国政府认为这两个条约并不能成为这段边界合法有效的条约根据。中国政府的主张是有事实依据的,而印度政府的观点则是无法成立的。
During the Sino-Indian border dispute in the 1950s and 1960s,the Indian government argued that the 1842 treaty and the 1894 treaty are the treaty bases of the eastern part of the western sector of Sino-Indian boundary(Tibetan-Ladakhi boundary).But the Chinese government argued that these two treaties couldn't be seen as the treaty bases to prove this part boundary is valid.The view of the Chinese government is based on the fact,but the view of Indian government is untenable.
出处
《中国边疆史地研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第2期89-99,共11页
China's Borderland History and Geography Studies
关键词
中印边界
西藏-拉达克边界
条约
Sino-Indian Boundary Tibetan-Ladakhi Boundary Treaty Basis