期刊文献+

肝脏、脾脏密度改变对慢性肝纤维化、早期肝硬化的诊断价值 被引量:1

The diagnostic value of hepatic and splenic density for chronic hepatic fibrosis and early cirrhosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同程度肝纤维化肝、脾密度的变化特点及其临床应用价值。方法:对经肝穿刺病理活检确诊的肝纤维化S1期12例、S2期14例、S3期9例、S4期/早期肝硬化13例、典型肝硬化16例以及20例正常组行上腹部16层螺旋CT平扫和增强扫描,于CT平扫图像上分别测量肝脏、脾脏密度及肝/脾CT值比值,将上述参数值与病理学分期作对照研究和统计学分析。结果:随着肝纤维化、肝硬化程度的加重,肝脏各叶的密度及肝平均密度均呈先降低后增高的趋势,其中S4期/早期肝硬化组肝脏各叶及平均密度最低。各组之间脾脏密度的比较均无差异。肝/脾CT值比值先降低后增高;S4期的肝/脾CT值比值最低(1.08±0.07),且与各组比较均有统计学差异。结论:肝脏密度和肝/脾CT值比值的测定对于早期肝硬化的诊断有一定帮助,但是其临床应用价值是有限的,不能简单的通过肝、脾密度的测量来诊断肝纤维化或早期肝硬化。 Objective:To investigate the feature of hepatic and splenic density change in chronic hepatic fibrosis,and explore its clinical application value.Methods:Plain and tri-stage enhance CT scan of epigast was performed in 84 participants,including 48 patients with hepatic fibrosis which divided into Si(12/48),S2(14/48),S3(9/48)and S4 (13/48)confirmed by liver pathologic biopsy,16 patients with typical cirrhosis,and 20 healthy subjects as control group.Hepatic and splenic density were measured on image of plain scan respectively,density ratios of liver/spleen was calculated in comparison with histopathologic stage.Results:The density of hepatic lobes and total liver trended to decreased at S1-4(S4 was minimun)but increased slightly than S4 at typical cirrhosis.The density of spleen had no significant difference among all groups.The density ratios of liver/spleen at S4 was minimum(1.08±0.07)and had statistical difference with other groups.Conclusion:The measurement of hepatic density and CT value ratios of liver/ spleen may be helpful for the diagnosis of early cirrhosis,but its clinical application value was limited,it's impossible to diagnose hepatic fibrosis or early cirrhosis by measuring the density of liver only.
出处 《华夏医学》 CAS 2008年第3期413-415,共3页 Acta Medicinae Sinica
基金 广西自然科学基金(桂科自0728155)
关键词 肝纤维化 病理学分期 密度 16层螺旋CT hepatic fibrosis histopathologic stage density 16-slices spiral CT
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献33

  • 1涂蓉,张阳德,黄海伟,伍保忠,郑妙琼.正常肝脾容积的CT研究[J].解剖学杂志,2004,27(3):317-318. 被引量:11
  • 2廖锦元,黄仲奎,龙莉玲,黎宁钦.16层螺旋CT体积测量评估肝硬化肝叶大小的价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2006,25(5):425-428. 被引量:34
  • 3陆健,王鸿帼,张涛,程斌,沈继明,胡振民,施裕新,赵云,徐建忠,顾春燕.螺旋CT三期扫描对肝纤维化诊断价值研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(9):1075-1078. 被引量:8
  • 41995年北京第5次全国传染病与寄生虫病学术会议讨论修订病毒性肝炎防治方案(试行)[J].中华传染病杂志,1995,(4):243-243.
  • 5Aguirre DA,Behling CA,Alpert E,et al.Liver fibrosis:noninvasive diagnosis with double contrast material-enhanced MR imaging[J].Radiology,2006,239 (2):425-437.
  • 6Annet L,Materne R,Danse E,et al.Hepatic flow parameters measured with MR imaging and doppler US:correlations with degree of cirrhosis and portal hypertensi[J].Radiology,2003,229 (2):409-414.
  • 7Cho SG,Kim MY,Kim H J,et al.Chronic hepatitis:in vivo proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of the liver and correlation with histopathologic findings[J].Radiology,2001,221(3):740-746.
  • 8Van Beers BE,Leconte I,Materne R,et al.Hepatic perfusion parameters in chronic liver disease:dynamic CT measurements correlated with disease severity[J].AJR,2001,176 (3):667-673.
  • 9Abdalla EK,Denys A,Chevalier P,et al.Total and semental liver volume variations:implications for lver surgery[J].Surgery,2004,135(4):404-410.
  • 10Schiano TD,Bodian C,Schwartz ME,et al.Accuracy and significance of computed tomographic scan assessment of hepatic volume in patients undergoing liver transplantation[J].Tranpl,2000,69 (4):545-550.

共引文献14075

同被引文献12

  • 1彭淑牖,刘颖斌.胰十二指肠切除术胰肠吻合口漏的防治措施[J].临床外科杂志,2004,12(4):199-200. 被引量:36
  • 2刘颖斌,朱锦辉,王建伟,方河清,李江涛,刘付宝,薛建锋,王许安,蔡炜龙,王俊,彭淑牖.三种不同胰肠吻合术可靠性比较的实验研究[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(5):339-343. 被引量:22
  • 3E1 Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, et al. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after panereaticoduodeneetomy, risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience ) [ J ]. WoAd J Surg, 2013,37(6) :1405-1418.
  • 4Daskalaki D, Butturini G, Molinali E, et al. A grading system earl predict clinical and economic outcomes of pancreatic fistula after panereatieoduodeneetomy: result in 755 consecutive patients [J]. Langenbeeks Arch Surg,2011,396( 1) :91-98.
  • 5Kim WS, Choi DW, Choi SH, et al. Clinical validation of the ISGPF classification and the risk factors of pancreatic fistula formation following duct-to-mucosa panereaticojejunostomy by one surgeon at a single center[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011,15 (12) :2187-2192.
  • 6Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et aL Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition [ J ]. Surgery, 2005,138 ( 1 ) :91-98.
  • 7Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, et al. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreatieoduodeneetomy pancreatieocutaneous fistula[ J ]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2004 ,8(8) :951-959.
  • 8Kakita A, Yoshida M, Takahashi T, et al. History of pancreati- coeunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy : development of a more reliable anastomosis technique [ J ]. J Nippon Med Sch, 2002, 69 (6) :549-556.
  • 9Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodeneetomy: results of a prospective randomized trial[ J ]. Surgery, 2003,134 (5) :766-771.
  • 10Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y. Selection of pancreaticoje- junostomy techniques according to pancreatic texture and duct size[J].Arch Surg, 2002, 137:1044-1047.

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部