期刊文献+

基于相容性准则的群组决策专家赋权最优模型 被引量:2

Optimal model of weighting experts in group decision-making based on compatibility criterion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在群组决策中,针对专家给出的正互反判断矩阵提出一种专家赋权最优模型。在判断矩阵满足完全一致性的条件下,探讨了加权几何平均组合判断矩阵与加权几何平均组合向量所构成的特征矩阵的相容性。同时在相容性概念基础上,建立了基于相容性准则下的专家赋权方法的最优化模型,研究了模型的求解方法。最后进行了实例分析,结果表明提出的模型是合理可行的。 According to the reciprocal judgment matrices provided by experts, the optimal model of weigh ring experts is proposed in the group decision-making. Under the conditions of judgment matrices satisfying con sistency, the compatibility of judgment matrices is discussed between the weighting geometric averaging combi nation judgment matrix and the characteristic matrix formed by weighting geometric averaging combination vec tors. Based on the concept of compatibility, the optimal model of weighting experts is constructed under the cri terion of minimizing the compatibility of judgment matrices. The solving method for the model is also discussed Finally, an example is illustrated and the results show that the model is reasonable and feasible.
作者 陈华友
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期1065-1068,共4页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 国家自然科学基金(70571001) 安徽省自然科学基金(070416245) 安徽教育厅省级教学研究项目(2007jyxm177) 安徽省优秀青年科技基金(08040106835) 安徽大学人才队伍建设项目 安徽大学创新团队项目资助课题
关键词 群组决策 相容性 专家赋权 组合判断矩阵 一致性 group decision-making compatibility weighting experts combination judgment matrix con-sistency
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

共引文献172

同被引文献27

  • 1董玉成,陈义华.层次分析法(AHP)中的检验[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(7):105-110. 被引量:40
  • 2梁樑,熊立,王国华.一种群决策中确定专家判断可信度的改进方法[J].系统工程,2004,22(6):91-94. 被引量:44
  • 3吕跃进,王玉燕,覃柏英.区间数的相容性与区间数互补判断矩阵的相容性研究[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版),2004,29(3):179-182. 被引量:9
  • 4黄卫来,黄松.一种改进的三角模糊数互补判断矩阵的排序方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(7):1090-1093. 被引量:20
  • 5Saaty T L. A ratio scale metric and compatibility of ratio scales: on the possibility of arrow's impossibility theo rem [J]. Applied Mathematical Letters, 1994, 8 (6): 51-57.
  • 6Chen C T. Extensions of the TOPSIS {or group deci- sion-making under fuzzy environment[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114: 1-91.
  • 7Herrea F, Herrera-viedma E, Verdegay J L. Direct approach processes in group decision making using lin- guistic OWA operators[J~ . Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 79(1): 175-190.
  • 8Xu ZeShui. A practical procedure for group decision making under incomplete muhiplicatlve linguistic prefer- ence relations [J].Group Decision and Negotiation, 2006, 15: 593-604.
  • 9Chiciana F, Herrera-viedma E, Herrea F, Alonso S. Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations[J]. European Jour nal of Operational Research, 2007, 182(1): 383-399.
  • 10Liou T S, Wang M J. Subjective assessment of mental workload-a fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria approach[J]. Fuzzy Set and Systems, 1994, 62: 155-165.

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部