期刊文献+

基于权利要求结构信息的中文专利无效检索模型 被引量:4

Invalidity search model for Chinese patent based on claim structure information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中文专利独立权利要求分为前序部分和特征部分。文中构建的专利无效检索模型,充分考虑了这一信息,从专利数据库中统计出40个分割词对独立权利要求进行分割处理。具体检索中采用两步检索:第一步进行布尔检索以提高召回率;第二步对申请专利与第一步返回专利独立权利要求的前序部分和特征部分分别进行相似度计算,适当组合后作为整体的相似度。实验中对分割前后以及分割后不同的词语权重选择方法对检索效果的影响作了比较,结果显示该模型是非常有效的。 Chinese patent independent claim contains a preamble portion and a characterizing portion. Invalidity search model for Chinese patent proposed in the paper draws on the structure information. Forty split words were extracted from patent database artificially; these words could divide independent claims into preamble portion and characterizing portion effectively and automatically. For it was impossible to compute similarity on the whole database two-step search method was used in practice. at 1-step Boolean query was applied to improve recall, at 2-step vector space model was used to compute similarities of pream- ble portion and characterizing portion between applying patent (query) and previous patents (documents) obtained at 1-step respectively, and then combined them properly to sort the search results in order to improve precision. Experiment data set comes from SIPO; search results with split claims are contrasted with that without them; different methods of term-weighting are compared. Evaluation results show that the model works well.
出处 《计算机应用研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第7期2068-2070,共3页 Application Research of Computers
基金 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70031010) 国家"985"工程经费资助项目
关键词 中文专利 专利检索 无效检索 权利要求 相似性 Chinese patent patent search invalidity search claim similarity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1KANDO N, LEONG M K. Workshop on patent retrieval SIGIR 2000 workshop report [ J ]. ACM SIGIR Forum Archives, 2000,34 ( 1 ) : 28-30.
  • 2ACL 2003. Proceedings of ACL 2003 workshop on patent corpus processing [ EB/OL ]. ( 2003 ) [ 2007- 03- 05 ]. http://www. slis. tsukuba. ac. jp/- fujii/acl2003ws. html.
  • 3IWAYAMA M,FUJII A,KANDO N. Overview of patent retrieval task at NTCIR-3 [ C ]//Proc of the 3rd NTCIR Workshop on Research in Information Retrieval, Automatic Text Summarization and Question Answering. Tokyo: [ s. n. ] ,2003:21-24.
  • 4FUJII A,IWAYAMA M,KANDO N. Overview of patent retrieval task at NTCIR-4[ C]//Proc of the 4th NTCIR Workshop on Research in Information Access Technologies, Information Retrieval, Question Answering and Summarization. Tokyo: [ s. n. ] ,2004:225-232.
  • 5FUJII A, IWAYAMA M, KANDO N. Overview of patent retrieval task at NTCIR-5 [ C ]//Proc of the 5th NTCIR Workshop on Evaluation of Information Access Technologies, Information Retrieval, Question Answering and Cross-lingual Information Access. Tokyo: [ s. n. ] ,2005 : 269 - 277.
  • 6LARKEY L S. A patent search and classification system[ C]//Proc of the 4th ACM Conference on Digital Libraries. 1999:79-87.
  • 7SHINMORI A, OKUMURA M. Patent claim processing for readability-structure analysis and term explanation [ C ]//Proc of ACL Workshop on Patent Corpus Processing. Tokyo: [ s. n. ] ,2003:56-65.
  • 8KIM J,HUANG Jin-xia, HAYONGJ Ha-yong. Patent document retrieval and classification at KAIST[ C ]//Proc of the 5th NTCIR Workshop on Evaluation of Information Access Technologies, Information Retrieval,Question Answering and Cross-lingual Information Access. Tokyo: [s. n. ] ,2005.
  • 9中华人民共和国国家知识产权局.审查指南[K].北京:知识产权出版社,2006.

共引文献1

同被引文献32

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部