突发事件应对、政治动员与行政应急法治

A Study of the Patterns of Emergency Responses:Political Mobilization versus Administrative Procedure Protocol

本文以突发事件的应对为研究的出发点,将突发事件应对分为"非法治模式"与"法治模式",两种模式表现在突发事件应对中的政治动员与行政应急法治两个方面。通过分析政治动员模式的内涵、有效性、价值及其弊端,笔者认为政治动员在目前我国现阶段政治和法律的现状下有继续实施的必要性,同时也要注意避免其弊端;在此基础上笔者分析了政治动员模式与行政应急法治相互结合的可能性,因为只有在行政应急法治的前提下才能避免政治动员的弊端,充分发挥政治动员的积极效果;最后笔者从利益诱导机制、政治动员能力、政治动员方式等方面就两者的结合提出了几点建议。

The author studied emergency responses and divided them into two types： political mobilization type and administrative procedure protocol type. Through analyses of the practices Of these two types of emergency response patterns, the author argues that political mobilization has its value in China＇s present political and legal environment and should be continued. Attention should be paid to avoid its drawbacks, however. The author also examined the possibility of integrating political mobilization strategy with administrative procedure protocol strategy and finds that only when political mobilization is implemented in the context of administrative procedure protocol constraint can the drawbacks of political mobilization be avoided.