期刊文献+

北京地铁工程邻近桥桩施工风险评估及控制对策探讨 被引量:30

A study on risk grade classification method and disposal measures for adjacent bridge piles in Beijing metro engineering
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨了北京地铁工程邻近桥梁施工风险等级划分应考虑的因素和风险等级划分方法,建议以桥基与地铁工程开挖影响破裂面的位置关系和桥基与地铁工程的水平距离作为主要依据,确定桥梁邻近等级。在此基础上,综合考虑桥梁现状质量,确定邻近桥梁的施工风险等级,并对不同的风险等级给出了相应的邻近桥梁基础加固保护对策,从而形成了对邻近桥梁的控制与保护技术程序,最后通过一个工程实例介绍了对邻近桥桩的评估及处理。 The influential factors and classification method for risk in Beijing metro engineering are discussed in detail. Firstly, the adjacent grade of the adjacent piles must be determined. Two factors such as the spatial relationship between bridge piles and the fracture face induced by metro construction and the distance between piles and metro engineering are advised as evaluation indices. Secondly, the residual bearing capacity for adjacent bidge must be evaluated. The risk grade for adjacent bridge piles can be determined based on the adjacent grade being classified and the residual bearing capacity being certain. The different reinforcement measures must be adopted in term of the adjacent bridge piles risk grade. Consequently, the disposal procedure is formed to ensure the safety of adjacent bridge piles. Finally, a construction example for the adjacent bridge piles disposal procedure is described in detail.
出处 《岩土力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第7期1837-1842,共6页 Rock and Soil Mechanics
基金 北京市自然科学基金(No8062016)
关键词 地铁工程 邻近桥桩 邻近等级 风险等级 施工对策 metro engineering adjacent bridge piles adjacent grade risk grade construction measures
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献42

  • 1先明其.隧道工程灾害事例调查报告[J].隧道译丛,1994(5):63-64. 被引量:1
  • 2Institute of Chemical Engineering,Nomenclature for hazard and risk assessment in the process industries [R].1985
  • 3NORSOK,Risk and emergency preparedness,(Z-013 rev.1),Annex C:Methodology for establishment and use of environmental risk acceptance criteria [R].1998
  • 4S.N Jonkman,P.H.A.J.M van Gelder,J.K Vrijling.An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage [J].Journal of Hazards materials,2003(A99):1-30
  • 5同济大学等.崇明越江通道工程风险分析研究总报告[R].2003,5
  • 6M.H.Faber,M.G.Stewart.Risk assessment for civil engineering facilities:critical overview and discussion [J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2003(80):173-184
  • 7Ohtsubo.H,Sumi Y.Committee reports on risk assessment [A].Proceedings of the 14th international ship and offshore structures congress[C].Nagsaki,Japan,2000,2:1-41
  • 8Melchers RE,Society.Tolerable and the ALARP principle [J].In:Melchers RE,Stewart MG,Editors.Probabilistic risk and hazard assessment.Netherlands:Balkema,1993:243-295
  • 9Sharp JV,Kam JC,Birkinshaw M.Review of criteria for inspection and maintenance and artic engineering [J] (OMAE 1993),Vol.2,New York:ASME,1993:363-371
  • 10Ditlevsen O.Risk acceptance criteria and design/or decision optimization [A].15th IABSE Congress:Structural engineering in consideration of economy,environment and energy[C].Copenhagen,1996

共引文献510

同被引文献199

引证文献30

二级引证文献208

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部