期刊文献+

改善鼻咽癌放化疗所致口咽疼痛伴焦虑的研究 被引量:1

Relief depression in nasopharyngeal cancer patients by controlling the severe pain in oral cavity caused by chemothery and radiation injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨采用芬太尼缓释透皮贴剂控制鼻咽癌放化疗所致的中重度口咽疼痛,来改善患者疼痛所致焦虑的可行性。方法将61例放化疗后出现中重度口咽疼痛伴焦虑症状的鼻咽癌患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用多瑞吉+口腔粘膜修复剂,对照组仅用口腔粘膜修复剂,观察两组口腔疼痛的缓解率,并以焦虑自评量表(SAS)评定治疗前后的SAS评分变化,记录多瑞吉的不良反应。结果口咽疼痛缓解率治疗组84.6%,对照组为45.7%,两组疼痛缓解率有统计学差异(P〈0.O5)。治疗后SAS评分:治疗组和对照组分别为:(53.59±8.07),(61.21±9.86),两组治疗后SAS评分有统计学差异(P〈0.05)。多瑞吉的不良反应主要为头昏、恶心等。结论使用多瑞吉可减轻放化疗所致中重度口咽疼痛,且安全性较好,口咽疼痛的控制有助于减轻患者的焦虑症状,为肿瘤合并焦虑症状的治疗提供一种新的尝试。 Objective To study its feasibility of relief depression in nasopharyngeal cancer patients with transdermal fentanyl by controlling the severe pain in oral cavity caused by chemothery and radiation injury. Methods 61 casees nasopharyngeal cancer patients with the severe pain in oral cavity caused by chemothery and radiation injury were devided into two groups:the treatment group were with transdermal fentanyl and mucous renovating drug, the control group were with mucous renovating drug only. Observe the relief of pain in oral cavity, and recorded the change of scores with SAS, and recorded adverse reactions. Results The rate of relief in the treatment group was 84.6%,in the control group was 45.7%,and with statistics difference (P〈0.05).The scores of SAS in the treatment group and in the control group were (53.59 ± 8.07),(61.21 ± 9.86),there were statistics difference (P〈 0. 05).adverse reactions were dizzy, nausea and so on. Conclusion the severe pain in oral cavity caused by chemothery and radiation injury can be controlled with transdermal fentanyl. And it was safe. lt is helpful to relief depression in nasopharyngeal cancer patients by controlling the severe pain in oral cavity, and worthy to application.
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2008年第15期56-58,共3页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 鼻咽癌 芬太尼缓释透皮贴剂 疼痛 焦虑症 Nasopharyngeal cancer Transdermal fentanyl Pain Depression
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献85

共引文献204

同被引文献7

  • 1律娜,夏娟,李春阳,程斌.国内防治放(化)疗所致口腔黏膜炎研究文献的循证医学分析[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2007,23(2):239-242. 被引量:19
  • 2Duncan GG, Epstein JB, Tu D, et al. Quality of life, mucositis, and xerostomia from radiotherapy for head and neck cancers : a report from the NCIC CTG HN2 randomized trial of an antimicrobial lozenge to prevent mucositis[J]. Head Neck, 2005,27(5) : 421.
  • 3Hwang D, Popat R, Bragdon C, et al. Effects of ceramide inhibition on experimental radiation-induced oral mucositis [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2005,100(3) : 321.
  • 4Radtke M L, Kolesar J M. Palifermin (Kepivance) for the treatment of oral mucositis in patients with hematologic malignancies requiting hematopoietic stem cell support [ J]. J Oncol Oharm Oract ,2005 ,11( 3 ) : 121.
  • 5Kalso E, Edwards JE, Moore RA, et al. Opioids in chronic non- cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety [J]. Pain,2004,112(3): 372.
  • 6Allan L, Hays H, Jensen NH, et al. Transdermal fentanyl provides more effective pain relief than SUStained release oral morphine for chronic non - cancer patients[J]. Evidence - based Healthcare ,2001,5(4) : 131.
  • 7Kalso E, Allan L, Dellemijn PLI, et al. Recommendations for using opioids in chronic non - cancer pain [ J ]. European Journal of Pain ,2003,7(5) : 381.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部