期刊文献+

量化研究与质化研究:社会科学领域两种对立的研究范式 被引量:21

Quantitative and Qualitative Researches:Two Competing Research Paradigms in Social Sciences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 量化研究与质化研究是社会科学领域两种对立的研究范式,两者在研究目标、对象及方法上都存在着明显的对立。具体说来,这些对立主要包含以下几个方面:研究目标上,量化研究重视预测控制而质化研究重视对意义的理解;研究对象上,量化研究强调事实的客观实在性而质化研究强调对象的主观意向性;研究方法上,量化研究注重经验证实而质化研究注重解释建构。这些对立在一定意义上也是相对的,要求我们以一种方法论的多元主义来对待两者的关系,按照问题来选择方法,而不是相反。 Quantitative and qualitative researches are in opposition to each other in social sciences in terms of their research goals, objects and methods. In particular, they differ from each other in the following aspects: in terms of research goals, the former place emphasis on the control of prediction but the latter on the understanding of meaning; in terms of research objects, the former attaches more importance to factuality and objectivity but the latter to the subjectivity embodied in the research objects; in terms of research methods, the former pay more attention to empirical evidence but the latter to interpretation and construction. These conflicts, however, are not absolute, so we have to adopt a pluralistic attitude toward the opposition between qualitative and quantitative researches; we have to select the method according to the issue in question but not vice versa.
作者 冯天荃
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期92-96,共5页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 质化研究 量化研究 对立 qualitative research quantitative research opposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Sechrest, L. & Sidani, S. Quantitative and qualitative methods: Is there an alternative[ J]. Evaluation and program planning, 1995,18, ( 1 ).
  • 2Ponterotto, G. Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science[ J]. Journal of counseling psychology, 2005, 52(2).
  • 3Krantz, D. L. Sustaining VS. Resolving the quantitative-qualitative debate [ J ]. Evaluation and Program Planning, 1995,18( 1 ).
  • 4Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. Introduction : The discipline and practice of qualitative research [ M ]. Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed. ), Sage Publications, Ins. Thousand Oaks, 2000.
  • 5Schurink and Strydom. The nature of research in the caring professions [ J ]. Research at grassroots : A primer for caring professions, 1998.
  • 6Ponterotto, G. & Grieger, I. Merging qualitative and quantitative perspectives in a research identity [ A ]. In M. Kopala & L. Suzuki ( Eds. ), Using qualitative methods in psychology, 1999.
  • 7Brink, P. Issues of reliability and validity[ A]. In J. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication, 1992.
  • 8Todd, I. & Nerlich, B(Ed. ). Mixing Methods in Psychology : The Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Theory and Practice [C]. Hove and New York: Psychology Press, 2004.

同被引文献195

引证文献21

二级引证文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部