期刊文献+

司法过程中的合宪性解释 被引量:11

On the Conformity-with-Constitution Interpretation in Judicial Process
原文传递
导出
摘要 当法律规范产生多个可能解释时,法官依职权应选择最符合宪法原则、并使该规范得以维持的解释。基于现代社会强调宪法基本价值而出现的一种法律解释方法,合宪性解释是宪法司法化在法律解释学领域的集中体现,其实质乃是传统法律方法论的体系解释向公法领域的延伸。司法过程中正确适用合宪性解释方法,需要遵循合宪性推定等原则与规则。合宪性解释方法是目前中国宪法司法化的一条有效路径。 The conformity with the constitution of the interpretation is that when some legal norm possibly has more than one explanation in judicial process, the judge must choose the explanation most conformable to the constitution according to his duty, meanwhile keep the norm remains in effect. It is a legal method in modern society when the constitutional values are emphasized. It is a symbol of the constitutional judicialization in legal hermeneutics. In essence, it is the extension of systematic interpretation in traditional legal methods to public law area. To appropriately use this method in judicial process, we must abide by such principles and rules as the presumption of constitutionality. The method of interpretation conforming to the constitution is an effective way to constitutional judicialization in China.
作者 姜福东
出处 《国家检察官学院学报》 CSSCI 2008年第4期94-100,共7页 Journal of National Prosecutors College
关键词 合宪性解释 宪法解释 体系解释 合宪性推定 宪法司法化 conformity-with-constitution interpretation constitutional interpretation systematic interpretation presumption of constitutionality constitutional judicialization
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献15

  • 1最高人民法院.《关于适用(中华人民共和国婚姻法).若干问题的解释(二)》[N].《人民法院报》,2003年9月2日第4版.
  • 2Justice Stone dissenting opinion , in : Gerald Gunther , Constitutional law, 12th ed. ( Minneola, NY: The F ounda - tionPress, 1991 ), P. 189.
  • 3[德国]克纳得.宪法基础理论[M].韩国:博英社,1997.
  • 4[日]桶口洋一.比较宪法[M].东京:青林书院,1999.
  • 5[韩]韩柄才.宪法裁判论[M].汉城:考试界,1994.
  • 6Fritz sharpf, "judicial review and the Political Question: A Functional Aanalysis, "The Yale law Journal, Vol, 75(1966) ,pp.578 - 83.
  • 7金云龙著.《违宪审查论》.三知院,449页.
  • 8Archibald Cox, The Court and The Constutution (Boston : Houghton Mifflin, 1987), .Arthur E. Sutherland ,Constitutionalism in America (New York:Blaisdell, 1965).
  • 9[德]拉伦茨.《法学方法论》,陈爱娥译,商务印书馆,2002年版,第56页,第四章《案件事实的形成及其法律判断》.
  • 10Legal logic, ed by Brain Oxford University Press, P. 33.

共引文献72

同被引文献151

引证文献11

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部