期刊文献+

未决羁押性质之比较研究 被引量:1

A Comparative Study of the Nature of Pretrial Detention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 未决羁押在不同的社会形态中反映出不同的性质,在不同的诉讼阶段也有不同的意义,基本上已经成为一种制度化的刑事诉讼强制措施。分析西方各国未决羁押制度的现状可以总结出各国未决羁押的特点。从这种比较中可以更好地理解我国未决羁押的现状和特点,也可以看到我国学术界对未决羁押性质的模糊认识所带来的问题。如欲解决这些问题,我国需要确定未决羁押的法定化,建立未决羁押的司法审查机制,未决羁押的司法救济机制,使未决羁押成为一个较封闭的司法控制系统。 Pretrial detention reflects the different nature in different society, and also has different meaning in different stage of litigation. It has already become an institutionalized coercive measure of criminal procedure basically. Through analyzing the current situation of pretrial detention in western countries, we can summarize its nature in different countries. And we can comprehend the nature and the current situation of pretrial detention in china much better from this comparison. In the same time, we can conclude the problems which are brought from the vague cognition of academe to the nature of pretrial detention in our country. For solving these problems, China needs to confirm the legalization of pretrial detention, establish the judicial review mechanism and judicial relief mechanism of pretrial detention, making pretrial detention become a more closed judicial control system.
机构地区 中南大学法学院
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第7期91-98,共8页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 未决羁押 性质 比较研究 刑事诉讼 强制措施 pretrial detention nature comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1][美]伦斯特洛姆.美国法律辞典[M].贺卫方等译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998.194.
  • 2[德]克劳思·罗科信 吴丽棋 译.刑事诉讼法(第24版)[M].北京:法律出版社,2003..
  • 3[4][法]卡斯东·斯特法尼.法国刑事诉讼法精义(下)[M].罗结珍译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.604.
  • 4[7]林钰雄.刑事诉讼法(上册)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.128.
  • 5[2]中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室.现代汉语词典(2002年增补本)[Z].北京:商务印书馆,2002.

共引文献11

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部