期刊文献+

农田土壤中农药的环境行为浓度预测 被引量:7

Concentration Prediction of Pesticides with Different Transformation Fate in Agricultural Soil Environment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据农药的理化参数和环境参数预测农药在田间土壤中的分布浓度是进行农药管理的重要手段。以Freundlich等式衍化出来的线性吸附曲线X=Kf×C和农药指数降解动力学C(t)=C0×exp(-kt)为基础,根据农药有机碳吸附常数(Koc)、辛醇/水比常数(Kow)、半衰期(DT50)等重要参数和土壤理化性质参数,建立了一段时间后田间土壤中农药的残留浓度、渗漏在地下水中的浓度、蒸发在空气中浓度和吸收在植物体内的浓度的预测方法,为农药管理、使用和风险评价提供了一种工具,以降低农药污染。该方法被应用于预测42种喷雾用杀菌剂和7种土壤施用杀菌剂的环境浓度。结果表明,喷雾施用丙森锌渗漏在地下水中的浓度最高,超过欧盟标准0.1μg·L-1两倍多;土壤残留浓度较大的为硫酸铜(0.039mg·kg-1)、多菌灵(0.023mg·kg-1)和甲霜灵(0.24mg·kg-1)。土壤施用90d后,噁霉灵渗漏在地下水中的浓度约为1.11μg·L-1,五氯硝基苯土壤中残留浓度更是达到1.78mg·kg-1。浓度预测结果可以与毒理学数据相结合用于农药风险评价。 Excessive or improper use of pesticides will bring pollutions into the environment. Prediction of pesticides concentration is an important instrument to manage pesticide use. In this study, based on pesticide parameters and soil parameters, a method was used to estimate the concentrations of pesticides that persist in soil, leach into groundwater, volatilize into air and enter to plant tissues. After depositing and being incorporated into the field soil, the pesticide was bound to soil solids following linear absorption kinetics X = Kf×C or dissolved in the soil water, Kf being the function of Kow (organic carbon-water partition coefficient). Degradation by biological activities occurred to absorp- tive pesticide and followed exponential kinetics C(t) = C0 ×exp(-kt), in which the degradation rate k was affected by reciprocal of pesticide dissipation haft-life (DT50) in the field. However, pesticide potential of leaching into groundwater relied on the soil property and soil water flux (q), by which the leaching concentration was calculated. The volatilization of pesticide with high vapor pressure from soil into air depended on pesticide Henry' s law constant(HENRY)or air-water partition coefficient(Kair-water). We estimated pesticide concentration in plant tissues uptake from soil through transpiration stream concentration factor(TSCF), the ratio between the concentration in the transpiration stream and the concentration in soil water. According to the calibration equations developed, the environmental concentrations of 42 spray and 7 soil-applied fungicides were predicted with their scientific default parameters being used. The results showed that after spraying, propineb concentration in groundwater was two times higher than 0.1 μg·L^-1. Copper sulfate, carbendazim and metalaxyl had greater residual concentration in soil than other fungicides. If mixed with soil, hymexazol concentration in groundwater was 1.11μg· L^-1 and quintozene in soil was 1.78 mg·kg^-1 after 90 days. The prediction results could serve the management and use of pesticides and be helpful for developing pesti- cide risk assessment if combined with toxicity studies.
出处 《农业环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期1574-1581,共8页 Journal of Agro-Environment Science
基金 农业部引进国际先进技术项目[2006-G13(A)] 科研院所社会公益项目研究专(2004DIB4J153) 上海农科院院发基金(农科发200709)
关键词 农药 参数 土壤环境 不同行为 浓度预测 pesticide parameters soil environment different transformation fate concentration prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Dore T, Bail M le, Verger P. Cropping systems and food safety[J]. Cahiers Agricultures, 2002, 11 (3) : 177-185.
  • 2Boesten J J T I, Gottesburen B. Testing PESTLA by two modellers for bentazone, ethoprophos in a sandy soil [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2000, 44: 283-305.
  • 3Fangio Vercruysse, Walter Steurbaut. POCER, the pesticide occupational and environmental riskindicator [J]. Crop Protection, 2002, 21:307- 315.
  • 4Klein M, Hosang J, Schaefer H, et al. Comparing and evaluating pesticide leaching models: results of simulations with PELMO [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2000, 44:263-281.
  • 5Leonard R A, Knisel W G, Still D A. GLEAMS: groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems [J]. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1987, 30(5) : 1403-1418.
  • 6Mullins J A, Carsel R F, Scarbrough J E, et al. PRZM-2, a Model for Predicting Pesticide Fate in the Crop Root and Unsaturated Soil Zones, Users Manual for Release 2.0[M]. Athens, GA:USEPA, 1993.
  • 7黄国强,李凌,李鑫钢.农药在土壤中迁移转化及模型方法研究进展[J].农业环境保护,2002,21(4):375-377. 被引量:19
  • 8刘刚才,Wu Laosheng,张建辉,李勇.4种农药在草坪中的消解特征及其2种模型模拟的效果比较[J].环境科学学报,2002,22(2):261-266. 被引量:7
  • 9熊文兰,陈一兵,林超文.利用PEARL模型评价农药渗透对地下水的污染[J].中国水土保持科学,2004,2(4):58-65. 被引量:5
  • 10Green R E, Karickhoff S W. Sorption estimates for modeling[M]. // Cheng HH ed. Pesticides in the Soil Environment : Pro-cesses, Impact, and Modeling. Madison, WI : Soil Science Society of America, 1990. 79-102.

二级参考文献19

  • 1朱忠林.合理使用农药,防止对地下水的污染[J].农药科学与管理,1994,15(3):34-37. 被引量:7
  • 2焦淑贞,姚建仁,郑永权,赵静,王政国.涕灭威在植物和土壤中的移动与分布[J].环境科学学报,1994,14(1):79-86. 被引量:4
  • 3WJ莱曼 WF雷尔 等.化学性质估算方法手册[M].北京:化学工业出版社,1991.455-794.
  • 4单正军 蔡道基 等.甲基异柳磷等四种农药在土壤中的吸附特性.农药环境毒理学与研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1998..
  • 5李连生.有机污染化学[M].北京:科学出版社,1991..
  • 6江希流 蔡道基 等.农药在水体与土壤表面的近发作用.农药环境毒理学与研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1998..
  • 7[1]Ares J O,Miglerina A M,Sanchez R.Patterns of groundwater concentration and fate of lindale in an irrigated semiarid area in Argentna[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,1999,18(7): 1354-1361
  • 8[2]Ma Q L,Hook J E,Wauchope R D.Evapotranspiration prediction: A comparison among GLEAMS,OPUS,PRZM-2 and RZWOM models in a humid and thermal climate[J].Agricultural Systems,1999,(1): 41-55
  • 9[3]Murphy K C,et al.Volatile and dislodgeable residues trichlorfon and isazofos application to turfgrass and impLication for human exposure[J].Crop Science,1996,36(6): 1433-1438
  • 10[4]Odanaka Y,et al.Runoff and leaching of pesticides in golf course[J].Journal of Pesticide Science,1994,19: 1-10

共引文献26

同被引文献107

引证文献7

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部