期刊文献+

三种粘结材料对正畸托槽的粘结效果比较 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着人们生活水平的日益提高。人们对口腔美观与功能的要求越来越高.各种固定矫治技术不断推广普及。直接粘结技术已成为正畸临床中不可或缺的一个环节,由此带来的釉质脱矿问题也越来越受到关注。Wenderoth等发现在没有任何预防措施的情况下.正畸患者牙釉质脱矿的患病率高达60%。釉质表面脱矿造成的釉白斑不仅影响美观。严重者还可发展成为早期釉质龋.如何预防矫治过程中的釉质脱矿已成为正畸粘结剂的研究热点。为此.笔者比较了含氟白酸蚀树脂粘结剂和树脂改良型玻璃离子粘固剂京津釉质粘结剂三种粘结系统对托槽粘结后釉质脱矿的影响,以期提高临床正畸治疗选择合适的粘结剂提供临床依据。
出处 《实用医药杂志》 2008年第7期807-808,共2页 Practical Journal of Medicine & Pharmacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Wenderoth C, Weinstein M, Borislow A. Effectiveness of a fluoride-releasing sealant in reducing decalcification during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999,116(6): 629.
  • 2Rosenbloom RG, Tinano FN. Salivary streptococcus muntans levels in patients before, during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1991,100(1):35.
  • 3潘一春,张丁,傅民魁.固定矫治器粘结前后牙齿颊面菌斑pH值和变形链球菌附着的改变[J].口腔正畸学,2003,10(1):23-26. 被引量:38
  • 4胡炜,傅民魁,谢以岳,王勤,程绰约.口腔正畸固定矫治器应用中牙釉质脱矿的临床调查[J].口腔正畸学,2001,8(2):51-54. 被引量:185
  • 5Ogaard B. Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-year-olds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1989,96:423.
  • 6Banks PA, Chadwick SM, Asher-McDade C, et al. Fluoridereleasing elastomerics-a prospective controlled clinical trial. Eur J Orthad, 2000;22(4):401.
  • 7Lippitz S J, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR. In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1998,113:620.
  • 8胡炜.树脂改良型玻璃离子粘固剂粘接正畸托槽的临床评价[J].口腔正畸学,2005,12(3):97-100. 被引量:5

二级参考文献19

  • 1Klockowski R, Davis El.,Joynt RB, et al. Bond strength and durability of glass ionomer cement used as bonding agents in the placement of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1989,96:60- 64.
  • 2Cacciafesta V, Subenberger U, Jost Brinkmann P G, et al.Shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded with different light-cured glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod, 1998, 20: 177-187.
  • 3Lippitz SJ, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR. In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1998, 113: 620- 624.
  • 4Millett DT, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, et al. Laboratory evaluation of a eompomer for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod, 1999, 69: 58-63.
  • 5Fricker JP. A new self-curing resin-modified glass ionomer cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets in vivo.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1998, 113.. 384 - 38G.
  • 6Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, et al. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesive and a rcsin-reinforced glass ionomer cement:An in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod, 1999, 69: 463-469.
  • 7David J. Hegarty, Tatiana V. Macfarlane. In vivo bracket retention comparison of a resin modified glass ionomer cement and a resin based bracket adhesive system after a year. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2002, 121:496 - 501.
  • 8Gaworski M, Weinstein M, Borislow A J, et al. Decalcification and bond failure: A comparison of a glass ionomer and a composite resin bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1999,116: 518- 521.
  • 9Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formationafter bonding and handing. Am J Orthod 1981 ;81:93-98.
  • 10Mizrahi E. Enamel demineralization following orthodontic treatment. Am JOrthod 1982;82:62-67.

共引文献216

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部