期刊文献+

基于现金交易的双元控制主体企业增值税逃税研究 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 在小规模纳税人现金交易逃税效用为正的假设前提下,本文建立了双元控制主体企业现金交易逃税决策模型,分析了增值税税率、查获率、处罚率以及现金交易折扣、产品价格等因子对现金交易比例的影响,并根据分析结果提出了交叉稽查差异策略、处罚经营者与购买方,以及提高增值税链条效用等政策性建议。
出处 《税务研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第7期69-72,共4页
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1MARRELLI, M., 1984, On Indirect Tax Evasion, Journal of Public Economics, 25.
  • 2YANIV, G., 1995, A Note on the Tax-Evading Film, National Tax Journal, 48.
  • 3ARIAS, R.J., 2005, A Note on Indirect Tax Evasion, Working Paper.
  • 4GORDON, J.EF., 1990, Evading Taxes by Selling for Cash, Oxford Economic Papers.
  • 5Chen, K.E & Chu, C.Y.C., 2002, Internal Control vs. External
  • 6GOERKE, L., 2006, Corporate and Personal Income Declarations, Discussion Paper.
  • 7刘华,姚志勇,王胜.双元控制主体企业现金交易逃税研究[J].税务与经济,2007(2):63-67. 被引量:2
  • 8ALLINGHAM, M.G. & SANDMO, A., 1972, Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis, Journal of Public Economics, 1.

二级参考文献7

  • 1刘华,霍景东,刘锦源.论税率、政府支出与税收监管对逃税行为的影响[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2005,22(1):6-7. 被引量:5
  • 2刘华,刘锦源,夏杰长.事后寻租对纳税策略的影响[J].税务研究,2005(9):87-88. 被引量:3
  • 3Chen, Kong - Pin and C.Y. Cyrus Chu. Internal Control Vs. External Manipulation: A Model of Corporate Income Tax Evasion [ R]. Institute for Social Sciences and Philosophy, Academia Sinica, Taipei,2002.
  • 4Crocker, K. J. and J. Slemrod. Corporate Tax Evasion with Agency Costs [ R]. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 10690,2004.
  • 5James P. F. Gordon. Evading Taxes by Selling for Cash [ R]. Oxford Economic Paper, New Series, Special Issue on Public Economics,1990,Vol. 42, No. (1) :244 -255.
  • 6Mihir A. Desai, Alexander Dyck, and Luigi Zingales. Corporate Governance and Taxation[ R]. Harvard Business School Working Paper,2003.
  • 7Mihir A. Desai, Dbammika. Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value[ R]. American Law & Economics Association Annual Meetings, Working Paper ,2005.

共引文献1

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部