期刊文献+

不确定判断与阅读多选题的猜测策略 被引量:5

Applying the Uncertainty Theory to Guessing in Reading Tests
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究应用不确定判断理论,采用有声思维的方法,探讨受试在不确定的情况下如何猜测多项选择阅读题。研究发现受试采用了代表性、可得性、锚定与调整等搜索性策略。而锚定与调整策略最为有效,常被用作“锚”去调整猜测的有背景知识、常识、逻辑推理、应试型知识等。这一发现对命题有启示,有助于改善试题质量,降低猜测的命中率,提高考试效度。 This study aims for an understanding of how candidates work out answers to multiple-choice reading comprehension questions where uncertainty arises. One participant was invited to guess the answers of 18 authentic multiple-choice reading comprehension questions and at the same time perform think-aloud. It was found that he succeeded in getting 7 of the 18 questions right. And this guessing was aided by such knowledge as background information, common sense, logic, and testwiseness. The results were discussed in light of Kahneman's theory of uncertainty and in terms of their implications for improving reading comprehension questions, reducing the probability of guessing and enhancing test validity.
作者 亓鲁霞
出处 《中国考试》 2008年第7期9-16,共8页 journal of China Examinations
基金 广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心资助
关键词 不确定判断 多项选择阅读题 应试型知识 Uncertainty judgment Multiple-choice reading questions Testwiseness
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献22

  • 1桂诗春.外语教学的认知基础[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(4):243-249. 被引量:159
  • 2桂诗春.英语词汇学习面面观——答客问[J].外语界,2006(1):57-65. 被引量:188
  • 3.《圣经》[M].南京:中国基督教协会,1998.第2-3页.
  • 4Altenberg, E. & H. Cairns. 1983. The effects of phonotactic constraints on lexical processing in bilingual and monolingual subjects [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 174- 188.
  • 5Biber, D. et al. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English [M]. London: Longman.
  • 6Brinton, L. & E. Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 7Doughty, C. 2001. Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form [A]. In P. Robinson (ed.). Cognitionand Second Language Instruction [ C]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 8Elder, C. & A. Davies. 2001. Experimenting with Uncertainty: Essays in Honour of Alan Davies [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 9Granger, S., E. Dagneaux & F. Meunier. 2002. The International Corpus of Learner English, Hand- book and CD-ROM [M]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
  • 10Griffin, D.&A. Tversky. 2002. The weighting of evidence and the determinants of confidence [A]. In T. Gilovich et al. (eds.). Heuristics and Biases : The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment [C]. Cambridge: CUP.

共引文献316

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部