期刊文献+

Ineffective oesophageal motility:Manometric subsets exhibit different symptom profiles 被引量:2

Ineffective oesophageal motility:Manometric subsets exhibit different symptom profiles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To compare the demographic and clinical features of different manometric subsets of ineffective oesophageal motility(IOM;defined as ≥ 30% wet swallows with distal contractile amplitude < 30 mmHg) ,and to determine whether the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux differs between IOM subsets. METHODS:Clinical characteristics of manometric subsets were determined in 100 IOM patients(73 female,median age 58 years) and compared to those of 100 age-and gender-matched patient controls with oesophageal symptoms,but normal manometry. Supine oesophageal manometry was performed with an eight-channel DentSleeve water-perfused catheter,and an ambulatory pH study assessed gastro-oesophageal reflux. RESULTS:Patients in the IOM subset featuring a majority of low-amplitude simultaneous contractions(LASC) experienced less heartburn(prevalence 26%) ,but more dysphagia(57%) than those in the IOM subset featuring low-amplitude propagated contractions(LAP;heartburn 70%,dysphagia 24%;both P ≤ 0.01) . LASC patients also experienced less heartburn and more dysphagia than patient controls(heartburn 68%,dysphagia 11%;both P < 0.001) . The prevalence of heartburn and dysphagia in IOM patients featuring a majority of non-transmitted sequences(NT) was 54%(P = 0.04 vs LASC) and 36%(P < 0.01 vs controls) ,respectively. No differences inage and gender distribution,chest pain prevalence,acid exposure time(AET) and symptom/reflux association existed between IOM subsets,or between subsets and controls. CONCLUSION:IOM patients with LASC exhibit a different symptom profile to those with LAP,but do not differ in gastro-oesophageal reflux prevalence. These findings raise the possibility of different pathophysiological mechanisms in IOM subsets,which warrants further investigation. AIM: To compare the demographic and clinical features of different manometric subsets of ineffective oesophageal motility (IOM; defined as ≥ 30% wet swallows with distal contractile amplitude 〈 30 mmHg), and to determine whether the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux differs between IOM subsets.METHODS: Clinical characteristics of manometric subsets were determined in 100 IOM patients (73 female, median age 58 years) and compared to those of 100 age-and gender-matched patient controls with oesophageal symptoms, but normal manometry. Supine oesophageal manometry was performed with an eight-channel DentSleeve water-perfused catheter, and an ambulatory pH study assessed gastrooesophageal reflux. RESULTS: Patients in the IOM subset featuring a majority of low-amplitude simultaneous contractions (LASC) experienced less heartburn (prevalence 26%), but more dysphagia (57%) than those in the IOM subset featuring low-amplitude propagated contractions (LAP; heartburn 70%, dysphagia 24%; both P ≤ 0.01). LASC patients also experienced less heartburn and more dysphagia than patient controls (heartburn 68%, dysphagia 11%; both P 〈 0.001). The prevalence of heartburn and dysphagia in IOM patients featuring a majority of non-transmitted sequences (NT) was 54% (P = 0.04 vs LASC) and 36% (P 〈 0.01 vs controls), respectively. No differences in age and gender distribution, chest pain prevalence, acid exposure time (AET) and symptom/reflux association existed between IOM subsets, or between subsets and controls. CONCLUSION: IOM patients with LASC exhibit a different symptom profile to those with LAP, but do not differ in gastro-oesophageal reflux prevalence. These findings raise the possibility of different pathophysiological mechanisms in IOM subsets, which warrants further investigation.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2008年第23期3719-3724,共6页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Age DYSPHAGIA HEARTBURN Ineffective oesophageal motility Oesophageal manometry Simultaneous contractions 食管 运动性 压力测试 同步收缩
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1[1]Leite LP,Johnston BT,Barrett J,Castell JA,Castell DO.Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM):the primary finding in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder.Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:1859-1865
  • 2[2]Kahrilas PJ,Dodds WJ,Hogan WJ.Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance.Gastroenterology 1988;94:73-80
  • 3[3]Tutuian R,Castell DO.Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility:studies using combined impedancemanometry.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:230-236
  • 4[4]Spechler SJ,Castell DO.Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities.Gut 2001;49:145-151
  • 5[5]Ho SC,Chang CS,Wu CY,Chen GH.Ineffective esophageal motility is a primary motility disorder in gastroesophageal reflux disease.Dig Dis Sci 2002;47:652-656
  • 6[6]Fouad YM,Katz PO,Hatlebakk JG,Castell DO.Ineffective esophageal motility:the most common motility abnormality in patients with GERD-associated respiratory symptoms.Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:1464-1467
  • 7[7]Diener U,Patti MG,Molena D,Fisichella PM,Way LW.Esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux disease.J Gastrointest Surg 2001;5:260-265
  • 8[8]Kahrilas PJ,Clouse RE,Hogan WJ.American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry.Gastroenterology 1994;107:1865-1884
  • 9[9]Drossman DA,Corraziari EC,Talley NJ,Thompson WG,Whitehead WE.Rome II integrative questionnaire.In:Drossman DA,Corraziari EC,Talley NJ,Thompson WG,Whitehead WE.Rome II:the functional gastrointestinal disorders.McLean VA:Degnon Associates,2000:691-710
  • 10[10]Bak YT,Lorang M,Evans PR,Kellow JE,Jones MP,Smith RC.Predictive value of symptom profiles in patients with suspected oesophageal dysmotility.Scand J Gastroenterol 1994;29:392-397

同被引文献4

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部