期刊文献+

基于可拓理论的描述逻辑扩展 被引量:2

Description Logic extension based on extenics theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统描述逻辑不适合于处理信息不全、存在隐性知识甚至存在矛盾前提的问题,所以作为语义Web的逻辑基础它是不充分的,为此引入可拓学中的物元及其发散规则对它进行了扩充。首先给出了物元的语义解释,然后引入物元及其发散规则扩充Tableau算法,生成了Tableau-E算法和Tableau-E′算法,从而实现了对实例断言集Abox的扩展以及一致性检测,弥补了传统描述逻辑的不足。 Traditional Description Logic (DL) does not fit to handle the problems with incomplete information, tracit knowledge or even contradiction premise. Therefore it is not sufficient to be the logical foundation of the Semantic Web. For this reason, the matter-element and divergence rules of Extenics were introduced to extend the traditional DL. Firstly, the semantic explanation of matter-element was given. Then the matter-element and divergence rules were used to extend the Tableau algorithm to be new Tableau-E algorithm and Tableau-E'algorithm, thus realizing the extension and consistency checking of Abox ( assertion of individuals), and making up the deficiency of traditional DL.
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第8期2071-2073,2076,共4页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60673131)
关键词 语义WEB 描述逻辑 可拓学 物元 发散规则 semantic Web description logic extenics matter-element divergence rule
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1BAADER F, HORROCKS I, SATTLER U. Description logics as ontology languages for the semantic Web[ C]// Festschrift in honor of Jarg Siekmann. Berlin: Springer, 2003:1 -20.
  • 2BAADER F, NUTT W. Basic description logic [ EB/OL]. [2007 - 08 -20]. http://www, inf. unibz, it/-franconi/dl/course/dlhb/ dlhb-02, pdf.
  • 3SCHMIDT-SCHAUB M, SMOLKA G. Attributive concept description with complements [ J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1991, 48(1) : 1 -26.
  • 4蒋运承,汤庸,王驹,周生明.面向语义Web的描述逻辑[J].模式识别与人工智能,2007,20(1):48-54. 被引量:15

二级参考文献13

  • 1史忠植,董明楷,蒋运承,张海俊.语义Web的逻辑基础[J].中国科学(E辑),2004,34(10):1123-1138. 被引量:71
  • 2Baader F, Sattler U. An Overview of Tableau Algorithms for Description Logics. Studia Logiea, 2001, 69(1): 5-40
  • 3Hladik J, Model J. Tableau Systems for SHIO and SHIQ //Harslev V, Moiler R, eds. Proc of the International Workshop on Description Logics. Whistler, Canada, 2004:82-90
  • 4Horrocks I, Sattler U. Ontology Reasoning in the SHOQ(D)Description Logic//Nebel B, ed. Proe of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Washington, USA:Morgan Kaufmann, 2001:199-204
  • 5Pan J Z, Horrocks I. Semantic Web Ontology Reasoning in the SHOQ(Dn) Description Logic // Proc of the International Workshop on Description Logics. Toulouse, France, 2002: 53-62
  • 6Horrocks I, Sattler U. A Tableaux Decision Procedure for SHOIQ// Kaelbling L P, ed. Proe of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. St Louis, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2005:448-453
  • 7Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The Semantic Web. Sclentifie American, 2001, 284(5) : 34-43
  • 8Horroeks I, DAML+OIL: A Reasonable Web Ontology Language//Jensen C S, Jeffery K G, eds. Proc of the 8th International Conference on Extending Database Technology. Berlin,Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2002:2-13
  • 9Antoniou G, van Harmelen F. Web Ontology Language:OWL//Staab S, Studer R, eds. Handbook on Ontologies. Berlin,Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2003, 67-92
  • 10Horrocks I. DAML+OIL: A Description Logic for the Semantic Web. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, 2002, 25(1): 4-9

共引文献14

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部