期刊文献+

体育倾向性的结构和量表编制 被引量:5

Structure and scale development of physical commitment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用访谈、开放式问卷等方法,构建了居民体育倾向性的理论维度,据此编制了体育倾向性量表。对量表进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析后表明,体育倾向性主要由情感体验、体育态度、主观规范、主观控制感4个因素构成。体育倾向性量表具有良好的信度与效度,可以作为评定居民体育倾向性的工具。 A physical commitment scale was compiled according to the foreign ones, the interviews and the questionnaire studies. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was adopted to test the scale and the physical commitment were composed of affection experience, physical attribute, subjective norm and perceived control. The scale proved to be reliable and valid.
出处 《武汉体育学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第7期75-78,共4页 Journal of Wuhan Sports University
关键词 运动心理学 体育倾向性 因素分析 量表编制 sport psychology physical commitment factor analysis scale establishment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Alexandris, K. , Grouios, G. , Tsorbatzoudis, H. , & Bliatsou, H. Relationship between perceived constraints and commitment to recreational sport participation of university students in Greece [J]. International Journal of Sport Management,2001,2:282-297.
  • 2Scanlan, T. K. An introduction to the Sport Commitment Model[J]. Journal of Sport Exercise Psychology, 1993,15 : 1- 15.
  • 3Carpenter,P. J. ,et al. A test of the Sport Commitment Model using structural equation modeling[J]. Journal of Sport Exercise Psychology, 1993,15 : 119-133.
  • 4Scanlan,T. K. ,et al . The Sport Commitment Model: Measurement develipment for the youth sport domain [J]. Journal of Sport Exercise Psychology, 1993,15:119-133.
  • 5Konstantions,A. ,et al. Testing the Sport Commitment Model in the Context of Exercise and Fitness Participation[J]. Journal of Sport Behavior,2001,25:217-230.
  • 6侯杰泰 成子娟 钟财文.结构方程式拟合优概念及常用指数之比较.教育研究学报,1996,11:73-81.
  • 7温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194. 被引量:1290

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55

共引文献1289

同被引文献83

引证文献5

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部