摘要
杜德桥认为目录学人为对作品进行分类,导致《丁约剑解》这类唐传奇作品为研究者忽视。杜氏此说有其合理之处,发人深思,对扩大唐传奇的研究大有裨益。然杜氏观点亦有可商榷之处:杜氏提出保持书籍的自然状态不作人为分类会导致中国古籍处于混乱状态;《丁约剑解》的文学性不为人所知,主要与传奇概念的模糊及中国古籍数量庞大有关,而非仅仅是目录学的分类问题。
DU De-qiao holds that it is because of the artificial classification Of literature works that scholars have neglected legends in Tang Dynasty, for example, The Story of DING Yue. There is something reasonable in Du's remarks, which is beneficial for the extension of the research on legends in Tang Dynasty. However, Du's remarks can be further discussed. Keeping books in their natural status may cause to the confusion of ancient Chinese books. The silence of the literature significance is caused by the obscurity of the conception of legends and the great amount of Chinese ancient books.
出处
《南通大学学报(社会科学版)》
2008年第4期69-73,共5页
Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition
关键词
目录分类
研究方法
启发意义
理论的可行性
bibliography
methods of research
edification significance
theoretical feasibility