期刊文献+

现代场景与基本善的使命——读菲尼斯《自然法与自然权利》 被引量:2

Modern Context and the Mission of Basic Goods——Read John Finnis Natural Law and Natural Rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《自然法与自然权利》是菲尼斯的经典代表作。基于对坚持价值中立的描述性社会科学的反思,菲尼斯提出了以基本善为主体的自然法理论。他的基本善包括生命、知识、游戏、社交、美感经验、实践理性、宗教等七个方面。通过设定基本善的不可通约等特征,菲尼斯的自然法理论既承袭了古典思想又应对了现代场景。 Natural Law and Natural Rights is a classic masterpiece of John Finnis. Base on reflections about descriptive sociology, he brings forward a theory of natural law which mainly consists of basic goods. Basic goods include life, knowledge, play, friendship, religion, aesthetic experience and practical reasonableness, For the characteristic of basic goods, this natural law theory both follows classic thoughts and deals with modern context.
作者 陆幸福
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第9期197-200,共4页 Hebei Law Science
基金 西南政法大学2007年度青年课题<新自然法学派研究>的阶段性成果
关键词 现代社会 基本善 不可通约 不证自明 modern society basic goods incommensurable self- evident
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[英]韦恩·莫里森.法理学:从古希腊到后现代[M].李桂林,等.武汉:武汉大学出版社,2003.
  • 2Neil MacCormic. Natural Law Reconsidered[ A]. john Finnis. Natural Law ( Volume Ⅰ)[ C]. New York University Press, 1991, p. 232,235.
  • 3Lloyd L. Weinreb. Natural Law and Justice[ M]. Harvard University Press, 1987, p. 108,115.
  • 4Henry Veatch. Natural Law and the "is" - "ought"Question:queries to Finnis and Grisez[A]. Swimming Against the Current in Contemporary Philosophy[ M]. The Catholic University of America Press, 1981, p. 293.
  • 5John Finnis. Natural Law and Natural Rights[N]. Clarendon Press, 1980,p.3,- 4,4 - 12,16,3,23,86,59,87,87 - 88,88,103 - 125,89.
  • 6John Finnis. LESAR DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: The "Value Of Human Life"And"The Right To Death" : Some Reflections On Cruzan And Ronald Dworkln[J]. Southern Illinois University Law Journal vol. 17 (Winter 1993), p. 570.
  • 7Germain Grisez,Joseph Boyle, John Finnis. Practical Principles, Moral Truth, and Ultimate Ends[ J ]. American Journal of Jurisprudence, vol. 32(1987), p. 106,101,110.
  • 8Russell Hittinger. A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory[M].University of Notre Dame Press, 1987, p. 42.
  • 9Brett G. Scharffs, "Adjudication and The Problem of Incommensurability", William & Mary Law Review, vol. 42(April 2001) , p. 1379.
  • 10Ruth Chang, "Introduction", Ruth Chang ed. Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, Harvard University Press , 1998,p.4.

共引文献12

同被引文献54

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部