期刊文献+

英美法系的衍生工具交易商法律制度 被引量:1

On the Legal System of Derivatives Dealer in Common Law System
原文传递
导出
摘要 场外金融衍生工具交易是当今全球金融业务的重要组成部分。发展我国场外金融衍生工具交易需要充分的制度支持。本文从成文法的视角细致地考察了英美法对场外交易商的规范制度,研究了英美法在金融创新中的重要作用,探讨了交易商的义务、责任和公共秩序方面的制约,深化了相关领域的研究成果。 OTC derivative transaction, which is one of the most important paits in global finance, plays a crucial role in drafting future pictures of Chinese finance. Besides techniques and experts demanding, law and regulation that decides the rights and responsibilities between dealers and end-users is called for. The writer gives more delicate research in Anglo-Saxon law over OTC derivatives transaction in series, including this one about OTC derivatives dealers. Careful research of duty, responsibility and policy of the OTC dealers has been done in a point of statute law view, that is amazing and helpful for consideration of drafting future law in China.
作者 王旸
出处 《金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第7期160-169,共10页 Journal of Financial Research
关键词 衍生工具 交易商 法律制度 OTC derivatives, dealer, legal system
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1鲁道夫·希法亭.《金融资本》[M].商务印书馆,1997年版.第211页.
  • 2约翰·S·戈登.2006.《伟大的博弈——华尔街金融帝国的崛起》,祁斌译,中信出版社.
  • 3望月礼二郎.2005.《英美法》,郭建、王仲涛译,牛豫燕校,商务出版社,第326页.
  • 4张光平.《从(泥鸽靶)谈衍生产品市场的发展》[J].期货与金融衍生品,2005,(3):43-43.
  • 5Bruce A. Baird , Linda D. Fienberg , Michael A. Dawson : Recent Developments in [6] Conrad G. Bahlke, Suitability and Appropriateness of Derivative Instruments, Derivatives 1996: Avoiding the Risk and Managing the Litigation, Practicing Law Institute Corporate Law and Practice Course Handbook Series, April, 1996.
  • 6E. P. Ellinger, , Eva Lomnicka and Richard Hooley: Ellinger's Modem Banking Law, p. 130.
  • 7Rasiah Gengatharen, p. 105 -108, Ellinger, Eva Lomnicka and Richard Hooley, pp. 127 -135.
  • 8Simon James, p. 111. and also see Ellinger, Eva Lomnicka and Richard Hooley,, pp. 128 - 135.
  • 9Litigation Involving Derivative Contracts, ALI-ABA Course of Study,May 10,1996.
  • 10Proctor & Gamble company v Bankers Trust Company, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

同被引文献15

  • 1朱益民.《中信泰富186亿港元巨亏内幕全揭秘》,《21世纪经济报道》2008年12月11日.
  • 2王大军.《国航东航失足“衍生品门”南航逃过套保劫》,《21世纪经济报道》2008年11月27日.
  • 3《泰山LCDKIKO债务转换出资》,http://www.asiae.co.kr/uhtml/read.jsp?idxno=2009012909035084590.
  • 4[英]迈哈伊·马图.《结构化衍生工具手册》,林涛等译,经济科学出版社2000年版,第7-12页.
  • 5《首尔市中央区法院“2008年民事假处分案第3816号”期权契约效力停止假处分案裁决书》,http://www.scourt.go.kr/suit/mysearch_list.jsp.
  • 6Geoffery B. Goldman, Crafting a Suitability Requirement for the Sale of the Over--the--Counter Derivatives: Should Regulators "Punish the Wail Street Hounds of Greed", 95 Colum L. Rev. 1112.
  • 7[韩]朴义浩.《与KIKO诉讼有关的法律争议点整理》[J].TheBanker,2009,(2).
  • 8[韩]李时润.《民事诉讼法》(修订版),博英社1996年韩文版,第38页.
  • 9[韩]金荣度.《与KIKO有关的主要争议点及其经济含义》[J].金融Brief(周刊),2009,(2).
  • 10See Keith Noyes, "KIKO" Cases: Misconceptions and Undesirable Legal Precedents, http://secure, webex, corn/g2, asp? id = H8MY4GH2.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部