期刊文献+

西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗老年抑郁症临床对照研究

Clinical Comparative Study of Treating Senile Patients with Depression with Citalopram & Amitriptyline
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨西酞普兰治疗老年抑郁症的临床疗效及安全性。方法将62例老年抑郁患者随机分配至西酞普兰与阿米替林组(各31例),西酞普兰治疗剂量为10-40mg/d,1次/d,阿米替林150—300mg/d,1/d,观察期为6周,疗效评定采用HAMD,安全性评价用TESS、实验室检查及查体。结果两组治疗后HAMD评分均显著下降,两组间比较差异无显著性(P〉0.05)。良反应发生率西普酞兰组显著低于阿米替林组(P〈0.05)。结论两药疗效相当,但西酞普兰副反应少且轻,日服量小,服药方便。 Objectives To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of citalopram in the treatment of senile patients with depression. Methods 62 patients with depression were randomly divided into the citalopram group and the amitriptyline group for 6 weeks. Hamilton depressive scale ( HAMD ) and treatment emigrant symptom scale ( TESS ) were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety before and after the treatment. Results The total scores of HAMD obviously decreased in both groups and there was no significant difference between the two groups after treatment (p 〉 0.05 ). The incidence rate of side effects in citalopram group was lower than that in amitriptyline group (p 〈 0.05). Conclusion The two drugs were of the similar efficacy. Besides, citalopram was of less and lighter side effects and enjoyed the advantage of smaller amount of daily dosage.
出处 《医学与社会》 2008年第7期14-14,17,共2页 Medicine and Society
关键词 西酞普兰 阿米替林 老年抑郁症 citalopram amitriptyline senile depression
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1吴文源.焦虑自评量表(SAS)[J].上海精神医学,1990,(2):44-44.
  • 2张明园.副反应量表(TESS)[J].上海精神医学,1990,2:63-63.
  • 3Hyttel J.Pharmacological characterization of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors(SSRIs) Int Clin Psychopharmacol,1994,9(1):19-26
  • 4Richelson M,Nelson A.Antagonisom by antidepressants of neurotransmitter receptors of normal human brain in vitro.J Pharmacol Exp Ther,1984,230(1):94-102
  • 5汤毓华.Hamilton焦虑量表(HAMA)[J].上海精神医学,1990,2:43-44.
  • 6王晓慧,王萍,景宝兰.苯二氮卓类药物的医源性成瘾[J].临床精神医学杂志,1995,5(1):36-37. 被引量:83

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部