期刊文献+

司法审查与民主关系的存在视角解读

An Explanation on the Relationship of Judicial Review and Democracy from the Visual Angle of Existence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法审查的正当性要以宪法为判断根据。以规范宪法学为主要哲学基础,以建立在宪法规范上的逻辑分析方法为主要研究方法的存在视角,是研究司法审查与民主之间关系的又一条思路。应该在明确区分司法审查制度与民主制度在交叉与平行、违宪与合宪的语境的基础上,探讨二者之间的关系。 The validity of judicial review must take the constitution as the judgment basis. The visual angle of existence, which regards the standard constitution as the main philosophical foundation, and uses the logic analysis based on the constitution regulations as the main research method, is one dominant approach to the relationship between judicial review and democracy. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss their relationship on the bases of the distinction of judicial review system and democracy system in the context of intersection and parallelism, violation and correspondence of constitution.
作者 胡晓玲
出处 《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第3期62-65,69,共5页 Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 司法审查 民主 作用视角 存在视角 judicial review democracy visual angle of function visual angle of existence
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]A.M.Bickel,The least Dangerous Branch.NewHa yen,1962.
  • 2张千帆.西方宪政体系(下册)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.245.
  • 3何海波.没有宪法的违宪审查——英国故事[J].中国社会科学,2005(2):109-122. 被引量:28
  • 4[5]M.Tushnet,Taking the Constitution away from Courts.Princeton,1999.
  • 5刘国.宪法裁判与民主的悖论[J].现代法学,2005,27(3):31-38. 被引量:5
  • 6[9][美]爱德华·S·考文.美国宪法的"高级法"背景[M].强世功,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1996:20.

二级参考文献126

  • 1International Transport Roth Gmbh v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] 3 WLR 344.
  • 2M. Elliot, Parliamentary Sovereignty and the New Constitutional Order (2002) Legal Study 340.
  • 3Lord Irvine, The Impact of the Human Rights Act: Parliament, the Courts and the Executive (2003) PublicLaw 308.
  • 4K. D. Ewing, The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy (1999) Modern Law Review 79.
  • 5Alison L. Young, Judicial Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act 1998 (2002) Cambridge Law Journal 53.
  • 6Jeffery Goldsworthy, The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Clarendon Press, 1999).
  • 7Report of the Select Committee on a Bill of Rights (HL 176, 1978).
  • 8Richard T. E. Latham, The Law and the Commonwealth (Oxford University Press, 1949), especially p.523.
  • 9H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press, 1961), pp. 97-111.
  • 10William Wade, Sovereignty: Revolution or Evolution? (1996) Law Quarterly Review 568, at 574.

共引文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部