期刊文献+

汽车车身耐撞性与NVH多学科设计优化研究 被引量:19

Research on Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Vehicle Body Crashworthiness and Noise,Vibration and Harshness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将多学科设计优化运用在汽车车身耐撞性研究中,通过拉丁方试验设计获取采样数据点,同时,为了提高了计算效率,构建了考虑整车正撞安全性和白车身扭转模态优化设计的多学科系统的响应面近似模型,然后运用序列响应面方法结合多学科可行性方法对近似模型进行优化。避免了传统整车耐撞性和白车身NVH相结合的多学科优化设计方法计算量大,且在碰撞非线性系统优化中常常易导致收敛缓慢甚至不收敛的缺点。在较好地满足CMVDR294安全法规的同时,使得白车身的扭转模态值得到提高,在一定程度上改善了汽车的安全性、舒适性和平顺性。 Sampling points were obtained by using Latin hypercube design of experimental method. In order to improve computing efficiency, a response surface method was employed to construct highly nonlinear crash and torsion mode functions. Response surface approximate functions were optimized by using multidiseiplinary design feasible (MDF) and sequential response surface methods were adopted to avoid much of computing time consume in the traditional optimization method and slow convergence or no convergence in the non-- linear impact and NVH systems. It improves first torsion mode frequency of the Body--In--White(BIW) vehicle and safety, comfort and smooth performance of the full vehicle in meeting the requirements of regulation CMVDR294.
出处 《中国机械工程》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第14期1760-1763,共4页 China Mechanical Engineering
基金 国家杰出青年基金资助项目(50625519) 国家自然科学基金资助重点项目(60635020)
关键词 多学科设计优化 NVH 近似模型 拉丁方试验设计 multidiseiplinary design optimization noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) approximate model Latin hypereube design of experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献25

  • 1谷良贤,龚春林,宋寒冰.协作优化方法的计算特性及其应用范围研究[J].空间科学学报,2002,22(z2):1-5. 被引量:8
  • 2Naceur H, Guo Y Q, Batoz J L, et al. Optimization of Drawbead Restraining Forces and Drawbead Design in Sheet Metal Forming Process. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2001,43(10)2407-2434.
  • 3Sosnowski W, Marczewska I, Marczewski A. Sensitivity Based Optimization of Sheet Forming Tools.Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2002,124(3): 319-328.
  • 4Hosder S, Watson L T, Grossman B, et al. Polynomial Respons Surface Approximation for the Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a High Speed Civil Transport.Optimization and Engineering,2001, 2(4): 431-452.
  • 5Lee S H, Kim H Y, Oh S I. Cylindrical Optimization Using Response Surface Method Based on Sto-chastic Process.Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2002, 130-131 : 490-496.
  • 6Myers R H, Montgomery D C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments. New York: Wiley,1995.
  • 7Neddermeijer H G, Van Oortmarssen G J, Piersma N, et al. A Framework for Response Surface Methodology for Simulation Optimization. The 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, Florida,2000.
  • 8Stander N, Craig K J. On the Robustness of a Simple Domain Reduction Scheme for Simulation-based Optimization. Engineering Computations,2002, 19(4): 431-450
  • 9Yu X Q,AIAA 98-4917,Missouri:AIAA,1998年
  • 10Korte J J,AGARD Interpanel ( FDP+ PEP) Symposium "Future AerospaceTechnology in the Ser,1997年

共引文献327

同被引文献140

引证文献19

二级引证文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部