摘要
新制度经济学和政治学新制度主义在发展中都因为缺乏现实性、历史性和社会性而受到批评。面对相似的问题,经济学领域兴起了以青木和格雷夫为代表的比较制度分析,政治学领域兴起了历史制度主义和社会学制度主义。本文从制度观、制度对行为的影响、制度的变迁、过去的制度对现在制度的影响、文化观念和意识形态在制度形成和发展中的作用等方面,对比较制度分析和历史制度主义、社会学制度主义进行了比较,就未来制度研究的发展趋势提出了看法。
New institutional economics and political neoinstitutionalism have been criticized because they ignore reality, historicity and sociality in their developments. As far as the similar problems in both schools are concerned, comparative institutional analysis, represented by Aoki and Grave, arises in the economic circle, while historical institutionalism and sociological institutionalism arise in the political field. Given the influence of institutional concept and institution itself on behavior, the impact of institutional changes and the past institutions on present institutions, the role of cultural ideas and ideology during the process of institution formation and development, we compare comparative institutional analysis with historical institutionalism and sociological institutionalism, and then make remarks on future developments in institutional researches.
出处
《经济学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第4期22-29,共8页
Economist
基金
湖南省政治经济学重点学科和湖南省社会科学规划项目(06YB73)的资助
关键词
新制度经济学
比较制度分析
历史制度主义
社会学制度主义
New institutional economics
Comparative institutional analysis
Historical institutionalism
Sociological institutionalism
