期刊文献+

Caner & Hansen方法在协整检验中的应用研究 被引量:2

The application investigation of the Caner & Hansen method in the cointegration test
原文传递
导出
摘要 经济理论认为有些经济变量之间长期的均衡关系不是传统的线性协整关系,而是呈现出所谓的阈值协整关系.因此为解决传统EG两步法在检验协整(包括线性协整与阈值协整)中的低势问题,在协整检验中引入Caner&Hansen方法,且采用Monte-Carlo仿真分析该方法的检验Size性质和检验势,并与EG两步法进行了比较研究.仿真发现首先该法存在一定程度的检验Size扭曲,且在检验Two-Regime的阈值协整时具有比检验Three-Regime的阈值协整较小的Size扭曲;其次Sup-R1T统计量在"持久性(Persistence)"很强时,具有比EG法高的检验势. Econormic theory often predicts that some economic variables must be linked through long-run threshold cointegration relationships. Thus, to resolve the problem that EG method has a low test power, this paper proposes Caner & Hansen method to test cointegration relationships. Through a set of Monte-Carlo simulation, we have investiged into the Caner & Hansen method in the cointegration test and compared the performance of this method with EG method. Monte-Carlo simulation shows that: First, this method has a little size distortions in the cointegration test(including linear cointegration and threshold cointegration), and has less size distortion in the Two-Regime model than in the Three-Regime model; Second, when the persistence of cointegration residual series is very strong, the test power of Sup - R1r is better than EG's.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第7期61-67,共7页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70571026)
关键词 Caner&Hansen方法 阈值协整 Monte-Carlo仿真 检验水平和检验势 (~aner&Hansen method threshold cointegration Monte-Carlo Simulation test size and test power
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Engle R F, Granger C W J. Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing[ J]. Econometrica,55(2): 251 - 276.
  • 2Nathan S. Balke and Thomas B. Fomby. Threshold cointegration[ J]. International Economic Reviews, 1997,38 (3) : 627 - 645.
  • 3Tong H. Threshold Models in Non-linear Time Series Analysis[ M]. New York: Spinger-Verlag, 1983.
  • 4Walter Enders, Granger C W. Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates [J]. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1998, 16(3) :304 - 311.
  • 5Ruey S. Tsay. Testing and modelling threshold autoregressive processes[ J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1989,84 (405) :231 - 239.
  • 6Pippenger M K, Goermg G E. A note on the empirical power of unit root tests under threshold processes[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1993, 55 : 373 - 481.
  • 7Bruce E. Hansen and Byeongseon Seo. Testing for two-regime threshold cointegation in vector error-correction models[ J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2002,110: 293 - 318.
  • 8Ming Chien Lo, Eric Zivot. Threshold cointegration and non-linear adjustment to the law of one price [ J ]. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2001,5:533 - 576.
  • 9Mehmet Caner, Bruce E. Hansen. Threshold autoregression with a unit root[J]. Econometrica, 2001,69(6):1555- 1596.
  • 10Chart K S, Tong h. A multiple threshold model AR(1) model[J]. Journal of Applied Probability, 1985,22:267- 279.

同被引文献73

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部