摘要
目的比较藜草花粉变应原皮肤挑刺试验(SPT)、支气管激发试验(BPT)、血清特异性IgE(sIgE)的关系,并评估上述试验对藜草花粉过敏性哮喘的诊断价值。方法对40例秋季哮喘发作的病人同时进行以上试验。结果SPT、sIgE与BPT有较高的符合率(70%~85%)。结论SPT、sIgE的诊断价值与BPT相仿,SPT和sIgE安全、简便,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the relationship between skin prick tests(SPT), bronchial provocation tests(BPT),and antichenopodium album pollen(CAP) specific IgE(sIgE) in CAPallergic asthmatic patients and to assess the relative value of these tests in a group of patients with a clinical history of asthma in the CAP season.Method 40 patients with fall asthmitic symptoms were tested.Result The three tests gave good agreement(75%~85%). Conclusion It is indicated that SPT or sIgE are convenience, safe and simple to the patients, and they are recommended for clinical use.
出处
《潍坊医学院学报》
1997年第4期281-282,共2页
Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang
关键词
藜草花粉
哮喘
皮肤挑刺试验
特异性IGE
chenopodium album pollen(CAP)
asthma
skin prick test
bronchial provocation test
specific IgE