修正后输出对目标语发展的作用被引量：33

The impact of modified output on target language development

导出

摘要本研究检测了重铸和引导两种纠错式反馈引起的学习者即时修正后输出与一般现在时第三人称单数规则动词发展的关系。实验持续四周,将学习者分为重铸组、引导组及控制组,分别进行考察,结果显示只有引导组引起的学习者修正后输出能成为目标语发展的重要标志。 This study examined the relationship between two typical kinds of corrective feedback (recast and elicitation) and the development of the third person singular form of simple present tense verbs. The study lasted four weeks, and employed a pre-test, eight treatment sessions, an immediate post-test and a delayed post-test. There were three treatment conditions, 30 subjects were randomly assigned into 3 groups: the recast group, the elicitation group and the control group. The results show that the learners' modified output triggered by elicitation can serve as the only significant index of the target language development. However, in most cases, the learners' modified output triggered by recast and the learners' self-generation can not serve as a significant index of the target language development.

作者陈晓湘张薇

机构地区湖南大学外国语学院

出处《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期279-286,共8页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research

基金湖南大学与法国普罗旺斯大学国际科技合作项目资助

关键词修正后输出纠错式反馈重铸引导目标语发展

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献32

1Bradi, S. 2002. Reexaming the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative speaker interactions [J]. Language Learning 52:1-42.
2Carpenter, H., K. Seon Jeon, D. MacGregor & A. Mackey. 2006. Learners' interpretations of recasts [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28.. 209-236.
3Ellis, R. 1997..SLA Research and Language Teaching [M]. Oxford: OUP.
4Ellis, R. 2001. Investigating form-focused instruction [J]. Language Learning 51: 1-46.
5Ellis, R. &Y. Sheen. 2006. Re-examining the role of recasts in second language acquisition [J]. Studies in Second Language 28: 557-600.
6Gass, S. &A. Mackey. 2006. Input, interaction and output in SLA [A]. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (eds.). Theories in SLA [C]. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7Havranek, G. & H. Cesnik. 2001. Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback [J]. EUROSLA Yearbook 1: 99-122.
8Izumi, S. 2003. Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis [J]. Applied Linguistics 24: 168-196.
9Loewen, S. 2005. Incidental focus on form and second language learning [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 361-386.
10Loewen, S. & K. Morgan-Short. 2004. To think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26: 35-57.