期刊文献+

再谈西方当代文体学流派的区分 被引量:3

Further reflections on the classification of different stylistic approaches
原文传递
导出
摘要 如何区分西方当代文体学流派,是一个貌似简单实际上非常复杂的事情。本文进一步探讨以下几个问题:(1)在同一著述中,是否应该采用同一区分标准?(2)如何区分语言学文体学和文学文体学?(3)文体学流派是否应分为两个不同层次?本文旨在通过梳理,更好地认识各种区分标准及其短长,看清文体学研究的性质、特点和发展变化。 How to classify different stylistic approaches is an issue that is much more complicated than it first appears. In view of recent critical debates, the present study offers a further discussion of the issue. The discussion focuses on the following questions: (1) whether one consistent criterion should be adopted in one classification; (2) how to distinguish linguistic stylistics and literary stylistics; (3) whether a classification should be carried out on two different levels. Through answering these questions and clearing up relevant confusions, we may gain a better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of the criteria concerned, and, more importantly, gain a clearer view both of the field in general and of some stylistic approaches in particular.
作者 申丹
机构地区 北京大学英语系
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期293-298,共6页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 国家社科基金项目"叙事 文体与潜文本"(06BWW018)的阶段研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Banfield, A. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences [M]. London: Routledge.
  • 2Burrows, J. 2002. The Englishing of juvenal: Computational stylistics and translated texts [J]. Style 36: 677-698.
  • 3Burton, D. 1980. Dialogue and Discourse [M]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • 4Burton, D. 1982. Through glass darkly: Through dark glasses [A]. In R. Carter (ed.). Language and Literature [C]. London: George Allen & Urwin. 195-214.
  • 5Carter, R. & P. Simpson. 1989. Introduction [A]. In R. Carter & P. Simpson (eds.). Language, Discourse and Literature [C]. London: Unwin Hyman. 1-20.
  • 6Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power [M]. London: Longman.
  • 7Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis [M]. London: Longman.
  • 8Fairclough, N. 2002. Critical linguistics/Critical discourse analysis [A]. In K. Malmkjaer ( ed. ). The Linguistics Encyclopedia (2nd edition) [Z]. London: Routledge. 102-107.
  • 9Fowler, R. 1986. Linguistic Criticism [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 10Fowler, R. 1991a. Critical Linguistics [A]. In K. Malmkjaer (ed.). The Linguistics Encyclopedia [Z]. London: Routledge. 89-93.

二级参考文献9

  • 1武瑷华.苏联功能修辞学四十年[J].外语教学与研究,1998,30(2):17-22. 被引量:2
  • 2Wales, K. A Dictionary of Stylistics [Z]. London & New York: Longman, 1989.
  • 3Weber, J.J. The Stylistics Reader: From Roman Jakobson to the Present [C]. London & New York:Arnold, 1996.
  • 4Carter, R. Language and Literature: An introductory reader in stylistics[C]. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.
  • 5Carter, R. & P. Simpson. Language, Discourse and Literature: An introductory reader in discourse stylistics[C]. London: Unwin Hyman,1989.
  • 6Enkvist, N. E. On defining style [A]. Enkvist,Spencer & Gregory. Lingusitics and Style [C].Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964.
  • 7Fowler, R. Linguistic Criticism [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • 8Jakobson, R. Closing statement linguistics and poetics, 1960 [A]. Weber, J. J. The Stylistics Reader: From Roman Jakobson to the Present [C].London & New York: Arnold, 1996. 10-35.
  • 9Taylor, T. J. & M. Toolan. Recent trends in stylistics [J]. Journal of Literary Semantics, 1984,13: 57-79.

共引文献23

同被引文献52

引证文献3

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部