期刊文献+

农村政策为什么在执行中容易走样 被引量:50

Why Rural Policies Are Easily Changed in Implementation
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从信息和激励的角度,解释中央的农村政策为什么在执行中容易走样。政策目标难以度量、公共部门激励不足、政策不完备等,给了执行者扭曲政策、谋取个人或集团利益的机会。在中央集权体制下,由于失去了投票选举和分权制衡两大强有力的监督工具,作为代理人的政策执行者及监管者更容易出现信息隐瞒、监督者榨取、政策套利、代理人之间合谋、委托人之间相互推诿和拆台等道德风险问题。 This paper explains why rural policies issued by the central government are easily changed in implementation from the perspective of information and incentive. The difficulty in measuring effects of policy, lack of incentive in public sector, and incompleteness of policy give executors chances to distort rural policies for their own or group interests. In the system of political centralization, there are no voting, no checks and balance. When these two powerful policing tools are missing, moral hazards by executors and monitors, such as hiding information, squeezing information rent, policy arbitrage, collusion between executor and monitor, buck-passing, and discordance easily happen.
作者 谭秋成
出处 《中国农村观察》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期2-17,共16页 China Rural Survey
基金 中国社会科学院重大项目"我国农村政策的制定程序与实施机制研究"的部分内容。
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Tirole, Jean, 1994, The Internal Organization of Government, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 46, No. 1.
  • 2Holmstrom, Bengt, and Paul, Milgrom, 1989, Multitask Principal -Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 7, Special Issue.
  • 3Laffont, Jean-Jacques, 1994, The New Economics of Regulation Ten Years After, Econometrica, Vol. 62, No. 3.
  • 4Alchian, Armen, and Harold, Demsetz, 1972, Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization, The American Economic Review, VoL 62, No. 5.
  • 5Fama, Eugene, 1980, Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88, No. 2.
  • 6Dixit, Avinash, 2002, Incentives and Organizations in the Public Sector: An Interpretative Review, Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 37, No. 4.
  • 7Calvert, Randal, Mathew, McCubbins and Barry, Weingast, 1989, A Theory of Political Control and Agency Discretion, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 33, No. 3.
  • 8Banks, Jeffrey, and Barry, Weingast, 1992, The Political Control of Bureaucracies under Asymmetric Information, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 36, No. 2.
  • 9McCubbins, Mathew, Noll, Roger, and Barry, Weingast, 1987, Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 3, No. 2.
  • 10Olson, Mancur, 1965, The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

二级参考文献18

  • 1邱运斌.消赤减债刻不容缓──对乡村负债的调查与思考[J].调研世界,2001(9):25-26. 被引量:3
  • 2周其仁.中国农村改革:国家和所有权关系的变化[J].中国社会科学季刊,1994,3(4).
  • 3张五常.《中国的前途》,(香港)信报有限公司出版社,1985年.
  • 4朱钢.《中西部地区乡村债务问题研究—以湖北、湖南、河南3县(市)为例》,打印稿,2004年.
  • 5Jin, Hehui, Yingyi, Qian and Barry, Weingast, 2001: "Regional Decentralization and Fiscal Incentives: Federalism, Chinese Style", Mimeo, Stanford University.
  • 6Qian, Yingyi and Barry, Weingast, 1997: "Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives", Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 11, No. 4.
  • 7Qian, Yingyi and Gerard, Roland, 1998: "Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint", The American Economic Review, 88, 1143- 1162.
  • 8蒋丽蕴.《中国的县级组织机构及其与乡镇组织的关系》,载马戎、刘世定、邱泽奇(主编).《中国乡镇组织变迁研究》,华夏出版社,2000年.
  • 9Sbleifer, Andrei, and Robert, Vishly, 1993: "Corruption", The Quarterly Journal of Economies, CVIII (1993), 599 - 618.
  • 10孙自铎.乡村债务何时了?──对安徽省乡村债务的分析[J].调研世界,2001(3):33-35. 被引量:10

共引文献28

同被引文献667

引证文献50

二级引证文献503

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部