期刊文献+

癌性胸水患者血清和胸水中水溶性细胞角蛋白19片段、癌胚抗原和神经元特异性烯醇化酶检测 被引量:1

Detection of CEA,Cyfra21-1,and NSE in serum and pleural fluid cancerous pleural effusion patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨血清和胸水中的水溶性细胞角蛋白19片段(Cyfra21-1)、癌胚抗原(CEA)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)对鉴别癌性胸水和非癌性胸水的诊断价值。方法:采用电化学发光免疫法测定36例癌性胸水和20例非癌性胸水患者胸水和血清中Cyfra21-1、CEA和NSE水平。结果:癌性胸水患者血清和胸水Cyfra21-1、CEA和NSE水平均高于非癌性胸水患者(P均<0.05)。对癌性胸水鉴别比较中,胸水中Cyfra21-1、CEA和NSE的敏感性分别为61.1%、50.0%和13.8%,而血清中Cyfra21-1、CEA和NSE分别为52.7%、36.1%和25.0%。结论:联合测定血清和胸水中的Cyfra21-1和CEA,并辅助细胞学检查,能提高癌性胸水诊断的敏感性。 Aim:To investigate the diagnostic potential of serum and pleural fluid determinations of Cyfra21-1, CEA, and NSE. Methods:Cyfra21-1, CEA, and NSE were quantified by using elcctrochemilumineseenee immunoassay kit in serum and pleural fluid samples of 36 patients with malignant pleural effusions and 20 with benign ones. Results : Levels of Cyfra21-1, CEA, and NSE in serum and pleural fluid of patients with malignant pleural effusions were significantly higher than those of patients with benign ones( P 〈0.05 ). The sensitivity of pleural Cyfra21-1, CEA, and NSE determination in diagnosis of malignant effusions was 61. 1% , 50.0% , and 13.8% , respectively, and those of serum level was 52.7% , 36.1% , and 25.0% , respectively. Conclusion : Determination of serum and pleural level of Cyfra21-1 and CEA together with'cytological examination might be helpful to reveal malignant origin of a pleural effusion.
出处 《郑州大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第4期768-771,共4页 Journal of Zhengzhou University(Medical Sciences)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Villena V, Lopez-Encuentra A, Echave-Sustaeta J,et al. Diagnostic value of CA549 in pleural fluid:comparison with CEA,CA15.3 and CA72.4[J]. Lung Cancer, 2003,40 (3) :289.
  • 2Shitrit D,Zingerman B,Shitrit AB, et al. Diagnostic value of CYFRA21-1, CEA, CA 19-9, CA 15 -3, and CA 125 assays in pleural effusions: analysis of 116 cases and review of the literature [ J ]. Oncologist, 2005,10 ( 7 ) :501.
  • 3陶惠云,陶臻,谭焰,王自正.胸液癌胚抗原、细胞角蛋白19片断联合检测对良恶性胸液鉴别诊断[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2001,24(2):114-114. 被引量:40
  • 4Wagner IC,Guimaraes MJ,da Silva LK,et al. Evaluation of serum and pleural levels of the tumor markers CEA, CYFRA21-1 and CA15-3 in patients with pleural effusion[ J]. J Bras Pneumol,2007,33 ( 2 ) : 185.

二级参考文献2

  • 1李留树 何长青 等.癌胚抗原测定在良恶性胸液鉴别诊断中价值[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1984,7:309-310.
  • 2李留树,中华结核和呼吸杂志,1984年,7卷,309页

共引文献39

同被引文献21

  • 1倪宁,李韶英.多种肿瘤标志物联合检测对胸腔积液鉴别诊断的意义[J].辽宁医学杂志,2004,18(6):308-309. 被引量:1
  • 2Penny Whiting,Anne WS Rutjes,Johannes B Reitsma,Patrick MM Bossuyt,Jos Kleijnen,刁骧(译),艾昌林(译),秦莉(审校),姚巡(审校).QUADAS的制定:用于系统评价中评价诊断性研究质量的工具[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(4):296-306. 被引量:68
  • 3邓可刚.诊断性研究的检索资源与检索方法[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(4):307-310. 被引量:4
  • 4Penny F Whiting,Marie E Weswood,Anne WS Rutjes,Johannes B Reitsma,Patrick NM Bossuyt,Jos Kleijnen,马章淳,钱楠.QUADAS评价:一种用于诊断性研究的质量评价工具(修订版)[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(7):531-536. 被引量:65
  • 5Chernow B, Sahn SA. Carcinomatous involvement of the pleura: an analysis of 96 patients. Am J Med, 1977, 63(5): 695–702.
  • 6Prakash BS, Reiman HM. Comparison of needle biopsy with cytologic analysis for the evaluation of pleural effusion: analysis of 414 cases. Mayo Clin Proc, 1985, 60(.
  • 7Johnston WW. The malignant pleural effusion. A review of cytopathologic diagnoses of 584 specimens from 472 consecutive patients. Cancer, 1985, 56(4): 905-909.
  • 8Menard O, Dousset B, Jacob C, et al. Improvement of the diagnosis of the cause of pleural effusion in patients with lung cancer by simultaneous quantification of c.
  • 9Filiz K, Zeynep T, Abdurrahman C, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of tumour marker levels in pleural effusions of malignant and benign origin. Clinica Chimica Acta, 2.
  • 10Ghayumi SM, Mehrabi S, Doroudchi M, et al. Diagnostic value of tumor markers for differentiating malignant and benign pleural effusions of Iranian patients. Pathol.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部