期刊文献+

罗哌卡因复合芬太尼硬膜外自控镇痛用于分娩镇痛临床疗效 被引量:3

PERIDURAL AUTO CONTROL ANALGESIA WITH RAPIVACAINE AND FENTANYL TO TREAT DELIVERY PAIN
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察罗哌卡因复合芬太尼硬膜外自控镇痛(PCEA)在分娩镇痛中的临床效果。方法收集我院ASA1~2级自愿要求镇痛、无禁忌症的初产妇120例为观察组,采用罗哌卡因复合芬太尼硬膜外阻滞麻醉,连接微量泵硬膜外自控镇痛;以同期未采取任何干预性镇痛措施进入产程的120例初产妇为对照组,观察两组产妇的疼痛程度、产程、分娩方式、产后出血、胎儿窘迫、新生儿Apgar评分情况。结果观察组疼痛程度较对照组明显减轻,第一产程活跃期较对照组明显缩短,剖宫产率较对照组明显下降(P<0.01),两组第二产程、产钳助产率、产后出血量、胎儿宫窘迫、新生儿窒息发生率比较差异无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论罗哌卡因复合芬太尼硬膜外自控镇痛用于分娩镇痛效果显著,缩短第一产程活跃期,降低剖宫产率,对母婴无影响,是目前最理想的镇痛方法。 Objective To explore the clinical effects of peridural auto-control analgesia(PACA) with rapivacaine and fentanyl on delivery pain. Methods 120 primiparae without contraindications in the treatment group volunteered to receive delivery analgesia through PACA by means of block anesthesia and micro-pump. Another 120 cases received no interrentions in delivery. Observations were made to evaluate the pain, the birth process, the delivery method, the postpartum bleeding and the fetal distress in both groups according to the Apgar Scales. Results In the first stage of labor, the treatment group got less pain, shorter active period and less casarean sections than the contrast group( P 〈0.01). In the second stage of labor,no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the rates of using forceps delivery, the amount of bleeding, fetal distress and the rate of asphyxia neonatorum ( P 〉 0.05). Conclusion The PACA with rapivacaine and fentanyl can produce good delivery analgesia,shorten the active period in the first stage of labor and reduce the rate of cesarean sections without causing bad effects on both parturients and their babies.
机构地区 沂水中心医院
出处 《山东医学高等专科学校学报》 2008年第4期287-289,共3页 Journal of Shandong Medical College
关键词 硬膜外自控镇痛 分娩镇痛 罗哌卡因 芬太尼 Peridural auto-control analgesia delivery analgesia Rapivacaine Fentanyl
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献22

  • 1何孔源,李树人.分娩镇痛法的临床应用与观察[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1989,9(2):102-104. 被引量:121
  • 2罗爱伦.病人自控镇痛(第1版)[M].北京:北京医科大学及中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1999.8-10.
  • 3钟亮 冯霞.临床麻醉新理论与实践[Z].中山大学附属第一医院,2004.27-43.
  • 4Griffin RP, Reyrdods F. Extradural, anaesthesia for caesarean section:a double-blind. Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine with 0.5% bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth, 1995,74(5) :512-516.
  • 5黄华芬 乐杰.无痛分娩的近期动态[J].国外医学妇产科分册,1998,25:241-242.
  • 6Gautier P,De Kock M,Van Steenberge L,et al.A double-blind comparison of 0.125% ropivacaine with sufentanil and 0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil for epidural analgesia.Anesthesiology,1999,90:772-778.
  • 7Gaiser RR,Venkateswaren P,Cheek TG,et al.Comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia for labor and vaginal delivery.J Clin Anesth,1997,9:564-568.
  • 8Writer WD,Stienstra R,Eddleston JM,et al.Neonatal outcome and mode of delivery after epidural analgesia for labour with ropivacaine and bupivacaine: a prospective meta-analysis.Br J Anesth,1998,81: 713-717.
  • 9Cederholm I.Preliminary risk-benefit analysis of ropivacaine in labour and following surgery.Drug Saf,1997,16: 391-402.
  • 10Litwin AA,Joseph L.Mode of delivery following labor epidural analgesia:influence of ropivacaine and bupivacaine.AANA J,2001,69: 259-261.

共引文献119

同被引文献9

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部