期刊文献+

自决权:并非分离主义的挡箭牌 被引量:6

The Rights of Self-Determination: Not the Shield of Secessionism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 独立和分离属于不同的领土变更情形。自决权的主要内容是独立权而非分离权。在国际法上,自决权是一项法律权利,而分离权却不是一项法律权利,它在国际法上不被提倡,在国内法上通常被禁止,充其量它是一项补救性的道德权利。因此,自决权和分离权没有必然的联系,自决权不应成为分离主义势力所假借的理论工具。 Independence and secession are classified to different territory change situations. The mainly content of rights of self-determination is the rights to independence but not rights to secession. In the international law, the rights of self-determination are a kind of legal rights while the rights to secession are not. The rights to secession aren't advocated in international law and is usually prohibited in nation. At best, it's a kind of supplemental moral rights. Therefore, there is no inevitable relation between the rights of self-determination and the rights to secession. The rights of self-determination should not become a theory tool which is used by the secessionist.
作者 王英津
出处 《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期24-28,59,共6页 Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目"自决理论研究"的阶段性成果 项目编号:04CZZ012
关键词 自决权 独立权 分离 分离权 分离主义 rights to self-determination, rights to independence, secession, rights to secession, secessionism
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1United Nations Monthly Chronicle, No. 2, 1970: 36.
  • 2Hurst Hunnum, Rethinking Self - Determination, Virginia Journal of Internationaal Law, Vol. 34, 1993. 49.
  • 3Malcolm IV Show, International Law, Second Edition, 1998.
  • 4[美]熊玠 余逊达 张铁军.无政府状态与世界秩序[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2001..
  • 5Allen Buchanan, Secession, State Breakdown and Humanitarian Intervention, in Deen K. Chatterjee and Don E. Scheid, eds., Ethics and Foreign Intervention, Cambridge University Press, 2003: 189- 211.
  • 6Antonio Cassese, Self - Determination of Peoples, A Legal Reappraisal, Cambridge University Press, 1995 : 12.
  • 7朱毓朝.国际法和国际政治中的分离主义[J].国际政治科学,2005(2):68-85. 被引量:17
  • 8P. H. Kooijmans, Tolerance, Sovereignty and Self-Determination, Netherlands International Law Review, 1996: 2.
  • 9Richard Falk, Self - Determination Under International Law : the Coherence of Doctrine Versus the Incoherence of Experience, in Wolfgang Danspeckrruber, ed., The Self-Determination of Peoples, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2ftft2, 31.
  • 10Vernon van Dyke, Human Rights, the United States, and the World Community, New York: Oxford University Press, 1970: 107.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Barbara Harf,and Ted Robert Gurr.Ethnic Conflict in World Politics[]..2004
  • 2Walker Connor.“Nationalism and Political Illegitimacy,”[].Ethnonationalism in the Contemporary World(.2002
  • 3Karen Parker.“Understanding Self-Determination:The Basics,”[].first international conference on the right to self-determination.2000
  • 4Richard Falk.“Self-Determination Under International Law:the coherence of doctrine versus the incoherence of experience,”[].The Self-Determination of Peoples(.2002
  • 5Wolfgang Danspeckgruber.“Self-Governance Plus Regional Integration:A Solution to Self-Determination or Secession Claims in the Emerging International System. http://www.tamilnation.org/selfdetermination/02danspeck.htm。 . 2002
  • 6Allen Buchanan.“Secession,State Breakdown and Humanitarian Intervention,”[]..
  • 7Ted Robert Gurr.Peoples versus States:Minorities at Risk in the New Century([]..2000
  • 8.Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples,”[].UN General As-sembly Resolution (XV).1960
  • 9Patrick J.Monahan,Michael J.Bryant,and Nancy C.Cote.“Coming to Terms with Plan B:Ten Principles Governing Secession,”. http://www.edhowe.org/pdf/Monahan.pdf . 1996
  • 10Allen Buchanan.“Democracy and Secession,”[]..1998

共引文献27

同被引文献89

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部