期刊文献+

脱敏剂对水门汀边缘封闭性的影响

Effects of desensitizers on the micro-leakage of cements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价脱敏剂对水门汀边缘封闭性的影响。方法:对48颗离体牙进行牙体预备,暴露牙本质,随机分为4组:聚羧酸锌水门汀组、玻璃离子水门汀组、树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀组、树脂水门汀组,每组根据脱敏剂不同再分为Gluma小组、SingleBond2小组、BisBlock小组和对照小组。应用水门汀粘固树脂被粘体于脱敏处理后的牙本质表面。每小组3个样本。所有样本在50%硝酸银溶液中渗透6h,荧光显影12h后剖开,测量显微镜下记录银离子渗透距离。采用SPSS13.0统计软件对实验数值进行分析,取α=0.05。结果:SingleBond2组的微渗漏最低;Gluma脱敏剂减少了树脂和玻璃离子水门汀的微渗漏;BisBlock使树脂和玻璃离子水门汀的微渗漏增加。结论:SingleBond2表现出最好的封闭效果;Gluma和Bisblock脱敏剂对微渗漏的影响与联用的水门汀相关。 Objective: To evaluate the effects of 3 desensitizers on sealing ability of 4 kinds of cements. Methods: 48 teeth were prepared to expose the dentin, divided into 4 groups randomly: zinc polycarboxylate cements (ZPCC) , glass ionomer cements ( GIC ) , resin modified glass ionomer cements ( RMGIC ) , resin cements ( RC ). Each group was subdivided into 4 subgroups--Gluma subgroup, SingleBond2 subgroup, BisBlock subgroup and control subgroup, each subgroup had 3 specimens. Applied the desensitizers on pretreated teeth, cemented the resin cylinder to dentin. All the specimens were immersed in the 50% AgNO3 snlution for 6 h, developing with a fluorescent lamp for another 12 h. Separated the specimen into 2 parts, measured the distance of Ag + pervasion, and analyzed the result with SPSS 13.0. Results: Specimens treated with SingleBond2 showed the least micro-leakage, Gluma decreased the micro-leakage of GIC and RC, BisBlock increased the micro-leakage of GIC and RC. Conclusion : SingleBond2 has the best sealing effect. The sealing influence of Gluma and Bisblock depends on the cements comhined.
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期529-531,共3页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词 脱敏剂 水门汀 微渗漏 Desensitizer Cements Microleakage
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Gillam DG, Newman HN, Davies EH, et al. Clinical evaluation of ferric oxalate in relieving dentine hypersensitivity [ J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2004,31 (3) :245 - 350.
  • 2Pamir T, Ozyazici M, Baloglu E, et al. The efficacy of three desensitizing agents in treatment of dentine hypersensitivity[J]. J Clin Pharm Ther, 2005, 30( 1 ) :73 -76.
  • 3Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full east crowns [ J]. Dent Mater, 2005, 21(5):445-453.
  • 4Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems[J]. Dent Mater, 2000, 16( 1 ) :48 -56.
  • 5Tjan AH,Dunn JR, Grant BE. Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with an adhesive resin cement[J].J Prosthet Dent, 1992, 67(1 ) :11 - 15.
  • 6胡军,王斌,杨艳丽,陈雯.3种粘结材料对金属嵌体冠边缘微渗漏的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2006,22(2):270-271. 被引量:4
  • 7Wolfart S, Linnemann J, Kern M. Crown retention with use of different sealing systems on prepared dentine [ J ]. J Oral Rehabil, 2003, 30( 11 ) : 1053 - 1061.
  • 8Baldissara P, Comin G, Martone F, et al. Comparative study of the marginal microleakage of six cements in fixed provisional crowns [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1998,80 ( 4 ) : 417 - 422.
  • 9Yiu CKY, Hiraishi N, Chersoni S, et al. Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization.Ⅱ: Differential permeability reduction with an oxalate desensitizer[J]. J Dent, 2006, 34(2) :106-116.

二级参考文献5

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部