摘要
目的:观察化学性缺氧状况下大鼠脑细胞[Ca2+]i和脑红蛋白(NGB)表达的变化及阿司匹林(ASA)对其变化的干预,并初步探讨其作用机制。方法:连二亚硫酸钠致原代培养大鼠脑细胞缺氧,用荧光探针Flou-3负载和NGB荧光免疫组化技术双标,激光共聚焦显微镜动态观察。结果:[Ca2+]i和NGB表达与缺氧持续时间有关,随缺氧时间的延长,荧光强度随之增高;经ASA预防性干预,两种荧光强度增高缓慢,其增高程度明显低于单纯缺氧组;治疗性干预,用药早期两种荧光强度增高明显,其增高程度与单纯缺氧组变化相近,后期则增高缓慢,其增高程度明显低于单纯缺氧组。[Ca2+]i浓度和NGB表达呈正相关。结论:ASA对原代培养大鼠脑细胞化学性缺氧损伤具有保护作用,其作用可能与ASA抑制细胞内Ca2+超载有关;NGB的表达可能是受到Ca2+-CaM复合物的调节;ASA预防性用药的早期保护作用明显优于治疗性用药。
AIM: To observe changes of intracellular free calcium levels([Ca^2+]i) and neuroglobin(NGB) expression when rats′ brain cells were exposed to chemical hypoxia,and the influence of aspirin(ASA) on changes as well as to study its mechanism primarily.METHODS: Sodium dihionite was used to deprive the oxygen in culture medium,and confocal laser scanning microscope with double fluorescence labeling methods were used to measure the changes of [Ca^2+]i and NGB expression in rats′ brain cells.Flou-3/AM and Cy-3 were used to indicate calcium concentration and NGB expression respectively.RESULTS: [Ca^2+]i and NGB expression are related to the time of hypoxia.Compared with the normal control group,average fluorescent intensity of [Ca^2+]i and NGB expression in the simple hypoxia group increased gradually with the time of the exposure in hypoxia.Moreover,there is the positive correlation between [Ca^2+]i and NGB expression.[Ca^2+]i and NGB expression in the ASA pretreated group increased slowly,the increase degree is significantly lower than that in the simple hypoxia group.[Ca^2+]i and NGB expression in the ASA treated group were increased significantly in early stage,the increase degree is not significant diffexence from the simple hypoxia group.At 120 min,[Ca^2+]i and NGB expression in the ASA treated group increased slowly,the increase degree is significantly lower than that in the simple hypoxia group.CONCLUSION: ASA has a protective effect on hypoxic injury of rats′ brain cells,which may be attribute to its inhibiting calcium overload,and NGB expression is regulated by Ca2+^-CaM complex.In addition,the neuroprotective effects of ASA pretreated group were better than ASA treated group in early stage.
出处
《中国临床药理学与治疗学》
CAS
CSCD
2008年第6期620-626,共7页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
基金
甘肃省新药临床前研究重点实验室开放及基金资助项目(GSKFKT-0703)
甘肃省自然科学基金暨中青年科技基金项目(3ZS061-A25-089)
兰州大学医学科研基金资助项目(010602)