期刊文献+

服务业集聚与产业结构优化关系探究 被引量:4

Studies on the Relationship between Service Industry Centralization and Industrial Structure Optimization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着全球化进程的不断加快,服务业集聚已经成为人们普遍关注的话题。产业集聚在获得规模效应的同时避免了垄断现象的产生,服务业集聚不但拥有这样的优势,而且还有自己独特的形成和发展特点。从产业结构的优化角度切入,借助区位商和专门化率等分析指标,以江苏省和上海市为例,对服务业集聚的形成进行理论和实证分析,提出产业结构的优化对于服务业集聚的形成和发展有着积极的作用。合理的产业结构能够为服务业集聚提供坚实的基础,各地区应该根据各自的产业特点积极的进行优化,催生服务业集聚,加快本地区经济的进一步发展。 As the speeding up of globalization, the service industry centralization has become a topic with widespread concern, The industry centralization can achieve large scale effect while avoiding the appearing of monopoly. And as far as the service industry centralization is concerned, it can not only obtain these advantages, but also have its own unique characteristics of forming and developing. From the perspective of the industrial structure optimization, by using Location quotient and Specialization rate analysis of Jiangsu Province and Shanghai City, this paper makes a theoretical and demonstrational analysis of the formation of the service industry centralization, holding the idea that optimized industrial structure provides a positive influence on its forming and developing process. A proper industrial structure is able to temp a solid foundation for the centralization, each region should act in accordance with their respective industrial characteristics to optimize structures and centralize the scales, in order to accelerate the further development of its regional economy.
作者 朱凯
出处 《经济研究导刊》 2008年第8期175-178,196,共5页 Economic Research Guide
基金 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(07JC790036)
关键词 服务业集聚 规模效应 区位商 专门化率 service industry centralization scale effect location quotient specialization rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

  • 1黄群慧.长江三角洲地区工业现代化问题初步研究[J].上海经济研究,2003,15(12):37-44. 被引量:5
  • 2刘志彪.市场竞争优势:以质量为基础的产品差别化[J].南京经济学院学报,1997(1):9-14. 被引量:12
  • 3Amiti,M, 1998, "New Trade Theories and Industrial Location in the EU: A Survey of Evidence",Oxford Review of Economic Policy,Vol 14(2》45-53.
  • 4Dixit Avinash and Joseph Stiglitz, 1977, "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity " American Economic Review 76,pp297-308.
  • 5Brulhart,Marius,2001,"Evolvinggeographic Coneentration of European Manufacturing Lndustries", Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,137: 215-243.
  • 6Fujita, Krugman, and Venables, 1999, The Spatial Economy.The MIT press: Cambrige,Massachusetts.
  • 7Kim, Sukkoo, 1995, "Expansion of Market and the Geographic Distribution of Economic Activities: The trends in U.S.Regional Manufacturing Structure,1860-1987",Quarterly Journal of Economics 110,881-908.
  • 8Kim, Sukkoo, 1998,"Economic Intergration and Convergence: U.S. Regions,1840-1987", Journal of Economic History vol 58,No.3:659-683.
  • 9Meyer, David R., 1983, "Emergence of th American Manufacturing belt :an Interpretation", 9:145-174.
  • 10Midelfart-Knarvik, K.H. Overman, H.G. Redding S.J.and A.J.Venables, 2000, "The Location of European Industry" ,www. econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/ajv/fineuloe.pdf.

共引文献1049

同被引文献23

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部