期刊文献+

晚期血吸虫病社会负担评价指标的研究 被引量:16

Evaluation Indices of Social Burden Caused by Advanced Schistosomiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究我国晚期血吸虫病社会负担评价指标,并确定其权重,为血吸虫病现场防治工作提供科学依据。方法通过文献资料确定晚期血吸虫病社会负担评价的一级指标;召开头脑风暴专家会议初步确定其二级指标;经第1轮专家咨询法对上述二级指标进行筛选,并对一级指标的重要性进行排序;通过第2、3轮专家咨询法得到各个二级指标的权重值。结果晚期血吸虫病社会负担评价指标体系由4个一级指标及16个二级指标构成。4个一级指标按其重要性排序依次为社会经济、政府形象、大众心理、社会安定。"社会经济"中"中央及地方政府投入的血防经费"的权重系数最大,为14.063;"政府形象"中"对患者的公平性即是否一视同仁"的权重系数最小,为3.125。结论本研究对晚期血吸虫病社会负担的各层面及其重要性进行了研究,确立了晚期血吸虫病社会负担评价指标体系。 Objective To study the evaluation indices and their weights of social burden caused by advanced schistosomiasis so as to provide scientific basis for control of the disease. Methods Primary indices of social burden evaluation for advanced schistosomiasis were summarized based on literature review. Secondary indices were put forward by a brainstorming process of experts. After the first round Delphi method, the secondary indices that needed were chosen, and the importance of primary indices was prioritized. Through the second and third round Delphi method, the weight of each secondary index was obtained. Results Four primary indices and 16 secondary indices consisted the index system of social burden induced by the disease. According to the significance, the 4 primary indices were arranged as social economy, government image, public psychology and social security. The weight of "funding for schistosomiasis control from central and local governments" in "social economic" stood the largest (14.063), while that of "equity to patients" in "government image", the smallest (3.125). Conclusion The study covers all major aspects and their significance in social burden of advanced schistosomiasis, and an evaluation index system has been established for field validation.
出处 《中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第3期205-209,共5页 Chinese Journal of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases
基金 WHO/TDR小额资助项目(No.MVP/CHN/08/01)~~
关键词 晚期血吸虫病 头脑风暴法 专家咨询法 社会负担 评价指标 Advanced schistosomiasis Brainstorming Delphi method Social burden Evaluation index
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1King CH. Quantification of disease burden due to schistosomiasis. in: Scientific Working Group. Report on Schistosomiasis[R]. Geneva: WHO/TDR Special Programme, 2005. 47-52.
  • 2Jia TW, Zhou XN, Wang XH, et al. Assessment of the agespecific disability weight of chronic schistosomiasis japonica[J]. Bull WHO, 2007, 85(6): 458-465.
  • 3王声湧.有必要开展疾病负担评价指标的研究和讨论[J].中华流行病学杂志,2001,22(4):244-245. 被引量:69
  • 4王富珍,齐亚莉,李辉.疾病负担研究的方法学进展——疾病负担综合评价[J].疾病控制杂志,2003,7(6):537-539. 被引量:37
  • 5冯鹤声,王苏中,姚崇华,苏江莲,胡先芝.北京市安贞小区脑卒中危险因素的调查分析[J].心肺血管病杂志,1994,13(3):129-132. 被引量:37
  • 6Jones CO, Williams HA. The social burden of malaria: what are we measuring?[J]. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2004, 71(Suppl 2): 156-161.
  • 7Cavallo MC, Fattore G. The economic and social burden of Alzheimer disease on families in the Lombardy region of Italy[J]. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 1997, 11(4): 184-190.
  • 8Simon GE. Social and economic burden of mood disorders[J]. Biol Psychiatry, 2003, 54(3): 208-215.
  • 9Messina CR, Lane DS, Glanz K, et al. Relationship of social support and social burden to repeated breast cancer screening in t he women's health initiative[J]. Hlth Psychol, 2004, 23 (6): 582- 594.
  • 10杜琳,罗不凡,王建军,潘冰莹,陈健,刘伟佳.广州市SARS社会负担研究[J].中国公共卫生管理,2006,22(4):274-276. 被引量:4

二级参考文献38

共引文献194

同被引文献198

引证文献16

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部