期刊文献+

支持抗肿瘤新药进入临床试验的非临床评价要点及关注问题 被引量:3

Non-clinical evaluation of conduct of human clinical trials for new anticancer drug
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新药非临床评价的主要目的是决策新药能否进入临床试验。抗肿瘤新药非临床评价中的利弊权衡需考虑到肿瘤疾病及其药物应用特点。多数抗肿瘤药物常伴有严重的不良反应,其临床受试对象多为临床治疗效果较差或根本无有效治疗方法的病人。若新药具有有效性的优势或特点,潜在毒性风险小于疾病自身危险,此时是可以考虑接受新药进入临床试验。本文主要根据该思路对非临床研究中的药效学、毒性实验、药动学进行技术审评,对临床前研究结果的支持性或存在问题进行评价。此外,本文也较为详细讨论了非临床评价的考虑要点及其关注问题。 The key role of non-clinical evaluation for a new drug is to predict whether the clinical trial could be held. Risk-benefits evaluation for anticancer drugs is needed to consider the correlative characteristics cancers of different with application of drug category. Most anticancer drugs possessing serious adverse reactions in therapeutic doses, together with the advanced cancer patients composing the major subjects of poor or nonresponsible to conventional clinical treatment, therefore with a new drug efficacious therapeutic options and less toxic risk than the disease itself could be accepted for clinical trials. Based on this theoretical concept, this article will discuss the rationality of the non-clinical evaluation for new anticancer drugs including the effectiveness, toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Moreover, some considerations and correlative problems for non- clinical evaluation in anticancer drugs are also presented.
出处 《中国新药与临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第7期549-555,共7页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
关键词 药物评价 临床前 抗肿瘤药 临床试验 drug evaluation, preclinical antineoplastic agents clinical trials
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1ANDREWS PA, ROY D. Nonclinical testing for oncology drug products[M] //TEICHER BA, ANDREWS PA. Anticancer drug development Guide. New Jersey: Humana Press, 2004: 313- 324.
  • 2DEGEORQE JJ, AHN CH, ANDREWS PA, et al. Regulatory considerations for preclinical development of anticancer drugs[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1998, 41(3): 173-185.
  • 3GRILLO-LOPEI AJ. The ODAC chronicles: Part 3. The FDA's philosophy and process for cancer drug evaluation and approval [J]. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2005 : 5 (1), 1-5.
  • 4HORSTMANN E, MCCABE MS, GROCHOW L, et al. Risks and benefits of phase 1 ontology trials, 1991 through 2002[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352(9): 895-904.
  • 5BROWN AP, MORRISSEY RL, FAIRCLOTH GT, et al.Preclinical toxicity studies of kahalalide F, a new anticancer agent: single and multiple dosing regimens in the rat[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2002, 50(4): 333-340.
  • 6ROBERT J. Place of in vitro models in preclinical evaluation of anticancer drugs[J]. Bull Cancer, 1996, 83(10): 801-808.
  • 7VASSAL G. Methodology and limitations of pre-clinical models for the development of anticarcinogenic chemotherapy combinations[J]. Bull Cancer, 1998, 85 ( 11 ) : 929-934.
  • 8ABRAMS TJ, MURRAY LJ, PESENTI E, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU11248 as a single agent and in combination with "standard of care" therapeutic agents for the treatment of breast cancer [J]. Mol Cancer Ther, 2003, 2(10): 1011-1021.
  • 9MARCHETTI S, SCHELLENS JH. The impact of FDA and EMEA guidelines on drug development in relation to Phase 0 trials[J]. Br J Cancer, 2007, 97(5): 577-581.
  • 10LIEBERMAN R, NELSON R. Dose-response and concentration-response relationships: clinical and regulatory perspectives [J]. Ther Drug Monit, 1993, 15(6): 498-502.

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部