摘要
普通程序与简易程序是民事诉讼程序中并立的两种基本程序构造。相对于普通程序而言,简易程序在诉讼效率方面有着明显的优势,它对于缓解日益增大的案件压力、扩大司法吸纳纠纷的能力具有积极意义。在追求民事诉讼程序简易化的背景之下,小额诉讼程序作为一种特殊的诉讼机制备受关注。因此,结合我国国情,探讨小额诉讼程序的引入等理论问题意义重大。
Both of ordinary procedure and summary proceeding are the two fundamental construction of civil procedure which exist side by side. Summary proceeding has outstanding advantages in efficiency in comparison with ordinary procedure, which makes it important in relieving the increasing pressure comes from more and more cases, and enlarging the capacity to solve disputes. In the background of chasing more simplified and flexible procedure, small claims procedure enjoys great attention as a special procedural mechanism. It is significant to probe into the problem of introducing small claims procedure base on the condition of China.
出处
《政法论丛》
2008年第4期15-18,共4页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目:民事诉讼制度的修改和完善(05JJD820007)
关键词
民事诉讼程序
简易化
小额诉讼
立法差异
civil procedure
simplification
small claims procedure
legislative differences