摘要
麦考密克描述阐释了司法审判中主要的法律论辩形式,包括演绎性证明,后果主义论辩,协调性论辩及一致性论辩。通过对此理论的经济分析,发现论辩主体为什么会采用这些论辩方式、应该如何运用及它们的功能为何,最终都立基于经济学的逻辑。
MacCormick describes and explains the elements of legal arguments advanced in justification of judicial decisions. There are deductive justification, consequentialist argument, coherence argument and consistency argument. Through economic analysis, it is found that why and how to apply the argument forms and their function are ultimately detemined by economic logic.
出处
《政法论丛》
2008年第4期46-50,共5页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
演绎性证明
后果主义论辩
协调性论辩
一致性论辩
经济分析
deductive justification
consequentialist argument
coherence argument
consistency argument
economic analysis
