历史的形而上学的发展及其终结

Development and end of metaphysical history

从历史理解的不同维度的分析入手,论述历史落入形而上学视界的原因及历史理解的两种不同逻辑思维,得出结论:思维方式的非历史性只能造成真实历史的缺失,从非历史性思维到历史性思维的跃迁,同时也是历史的形而上学史与历史的形而上学的终结史;应倡导一种辩证的逻辑思维,即历史的思维,只有在历史的思维下,才能理解历史本身。

Beginning from the analysis of the different ways of thinking about history, the paper discussed the reason why the history is distorted into metaphysical history and two different ways of thinking emerged. Based on the argument, it drew the conclusions that the metaphysical way of thinking could only eventually make the loss of real history and the development of the way of thinking essentially was the same as the development of the metaphysical history, whereas the metaphysical history was ended with the emergence of dialectical way of thinking. We are in favor of the dialectical way of thinking whereby only we can understand the history itself correctly.