摘要
自1989年始，我们随机选择面积10％以上，Ⅱ度烧伤患者，分为MEBT组、干燥疗法组进行对比观察，在创面疼痛控制、创面感染控制、治愈率、致残率、死亡率五个方面，MEBT组均显示出巨大优势：MEBT控制疼痛极为满意，用药方便无痛苦，治愈率高：92％，致残率低：4％，大面积死亡率4％。尤其在对吞服硫酸致上消化道灼伤的治疗，疗效奇佳，值得基层厂矿医院推广。
Patients with burn area over 10%BSA and deepsecond degree were divided randomly into 2 groupsand treated respectively with MEBT and dry therapy.A comparison between the efficacy of the two therapeutic methods was made, which included analgesiceffect, antiinfective effect, curative rate, disablementrate and death rate. The results revealed that MEBTwas superior to dry therapy in all these respects.MEBT had very good analgesic effect. lts curativerate was 92%. Disablement rate was only 4% anddeath rate for large area burn was only 4%. MEBTshowed very good efficacy in treating surfuric acidburn in digestive tract.
出处
《中国烧伤创疡杂志》
1997年第4期26-27,33,共3页
The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
