期刊文献+

基于结构多尺度分析的超大跨斜拉桥损伤定位方法研究 被引量:2

Damage Location Identification for a Super-Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge Based on Structural Multi-Scale Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以苏通大桥斜拉桥的扁平钢箱梁结构为分析对象,采用子结构方法,将扁平钢箱梁结构的整体尺度动力特性和细节尺度构件损伤相互衔接,实现了超大跨斜拉桥的多尺度损伤分析。在此基础上,对模态曲率指标和模态应变能指标的损伤识别效果进行了对比分析。结果表明:采用子结构方法可以有效地实现钢箱梁局部构件损伤与整体结构响应的多尺度衔接,从而较真实地研究钢箱梁局部构件损伤对超大跨斜拉桥动力特性的影响;无噪声情况下,模态曲率指标能正确识别所有损伤工况,而模态应变能指标则对部分损伤工况的识别效果较差;模态应变能指标的抗噪声能力总体上优于模态曲率指标。 The full-scale dynamic characteristics and fine-scale local damage of steel box girder are connected by the substructuring method to realize structural multi-scale damage analysis for a super-longspan cable-stayed bridge, Sutong Cable-stayed Bridge. The modal curvature index and modal strain energy index for damage localization of steel box girder are further comparatively studied. The analysis results show that: (i) the effect of the simulated damage in various components of the steel box girder on the dynamic characteristics of a super-long-span cable-stayed bridge should be properly considered in the structural damage analyses using the multi-scale numerical computation; (ii) in the absence of noise, modal curvature index can properly identify all structural damage cases of steel box girder, whereas modal strain energy index fails to identify some damage cases; (iii) modal strain energy index is the best in anti-noise compared with modal curvature index on the whole.
出处 《防灾减灾工程学报》 CSCD 2008年第3期268-273,共6页 Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering
基金 国家863计划项目(2006AA04Z416) 国家杰出青年基金项目(50725828)资助
关键词 超大跨斜拉桥 模态参数 损伤定位 多尺度损伤分析 钢箱梁 super-long-span cable-stayed bridge modal parameter damage location identification multiscale damage analysis steel box girder
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献29

  • 1刘丽萍,王应良.南京长江第二大桥南汊主桥流线形薄壁扁平钢箱梁分析的新方法[J].公路交通科技,2004,21(7):51-53. 被引量:17
  • 2徐伟,李智,张肖宁.子模型法在大跨径斜拉桥桥面结构分析中的应用[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(6):30-34. 被引量:75
  • 3Salawu O S.Detection of structural damage through changed in frequency:a review [J].Engineering Structures,1997,19(9):718-723.
  • 4Chang P C,Flatau A,Liu S C.Review paper:health monitoring of civil infrastructure[J].Structural Health Monitoring,2003,2(3):257-267.
  • 5Doebling S W,Farrar C R,Prime M B,et al.A review of damage identification methods that examine changes in dynamic properties [J].Shock and Vibration Dig,1998,30(2):91-105.
  • 6Ghanem R,Shinozuka M.Structural system identification Ⅰ:theory and Ⅱ:experimental verification [J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1995,121(2):255-273.
  • 7东南大学土木工程学院.润扬长江公路大桥结构安全监测系统研究(北汊斜拉桥索塔动力特性测试)[R].南京:东南大学土木工程学院,2002..
  • 8东南大学土木工程学院.润扬长江公路斜拉桥动力测试与有限元分析[R].南京:东南大学土木工程学院,2003..
  • 9Wang B S, Liang X B, NiYQ, etal. Comparative study of damage indices in application to a ling-span suspension bridge[A]. In: Ko J M, Xu Y L, eds.proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Strctural Dynamics[C].Hong Kong:the Hongkong Polytechnic University,2000.1085-1092
  • 10Stubbs N, Kim J T. Damage localization in structures without baseline model parameters[J].AIAA J, 1996, 34(8) : 1644-1649.

共引文献185

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部