胡宏对王安石经说及《周礼》的批评

On Hu Hong's Criticisms of Wang Anshi's Explanations on Confucian Classics and

胡宏站在理学立场,批王安石经说及所依傍的《周礼》,认为王氏所倚重的《周礼》乃伪妄之书,开理学家批评《周礼》之先河。理学与新学的相异处反映了双方理论存在着基本的差异;理学与新学的相同处又体现了宋学义理思潮兴起的时代背景和发展趋势,而与汉学重训诂的学风不同。新学、理学相同相异的学术观点,分别体现了己派及宋学的思想特色,并都为宋学的发展做出了贡献。

From the Neo-Confucianism viewpoint, Hu Hong criticized Wang Anshi＇s explanations on Confucian Classics and rites in Zhou Dynasty depended by Wang Anshi. Hu Hong thought rites in Zhou Dynasty were a false and absurd book and through this he opened the precedent that the principle scientists began to criticize rites in Zhou Dynasty. Differences between Neo-Confucianism and New Learning reflected these two theories had a basic gap. The Similarities between Neo-Confucianism and New Learning manifested the time background and the trend of development in studying of righteousness principle of Song studies, but they were different from the study tradition of the explanations of words of Si- nology. The similar and different academic viewpoints between New Learning and Neo-Confucianism manifested thought characteristics of oneself and Song studies separately, and had made a contribution for the development of Song studies.