学术争鸣中的常识、常理和常规——为《为什么检察制度屡受质疑》一文辩护

General Knowledge,Sense and Principle of the Acdemic Contentions

学术争鸣中不能断章取义、偷梁换柱,不能不顾常识、进行人身攻击,不能不讲逻辑、自相矛盾;除此之外还有很重要的一项规则是,当行使学术权利将陷入利益冲突时,必须遵守利益回避的原则。即使从最严格的学术规则来审视,《为什么检察制度屡受质疑》一文也无可指责,相反,《学术批评应当客观理性》一文却有累累硬伤。

In the acdemic contentions, such phenomena should be strictly prohibted as quoting out of context, personal attack and self-contradiction. There is an aditional principle to be obeyed, that is, when exercising acdemic rights will make oneself fall into interests conflict, he must withdraw. Viewed from these acdemic normals, the article ＂why China＇s prosectorial system is always challenged＂ is above criticism, while the article ＂acdemic contentions should be reasonable and objective＂ is full of defects.