行为抑制/激活系统量表中文版的信效度分析

The Chinese Version of the BIS/BAS Scale:Reliability and Validity

目的:考察Carver和White的行为抑制/激活系统量表中文版的信度和效度。方法:采用行为抑制/激活系统量表、艾森克人格问卷和状态-特质焦虑量表对262名大学生进行调查。结果:(1)项目分析显示,除题项1和18,其余题目的鉴别度均符合心理测量学要求。(2)探索性因素分析(各因素条目负荷分别为0.69-0.83,0.59-0.80,0.36-0.59,0.41-0.72)和验证性因素分析均显示四因素结构更为合理(RMSEA=0.042,GFI=0.926,AGFI=0.902,IFI=0.891,CFI=0.887,AIC=280.349)。(3)行为抑制系统与神经质呈中度相关(r=0.53,P<0.01),行为激活-驱力与外向性呈中度相关(r=0.30,P<0.01);特质焦虑与行为抑制系统呈中度相关(r=0.35,P<0.01),与行为激活系统三个维度无显著相关。显示量表有较好的聚合和区分效度。(4)四个因素的Cronbachα系数分别为0.59、0.72、0.66和0.55。结论:行为抑制/激活系统量表中文版是比较可靠和有效的测试人格建构的量表。

Objective： To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Carver and Whitens （1994） Behavioral Inhibition System and Behavioral Activation System Scale （ BIS/BAS Scale） . Methods： The BIS/ BAS Scale, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire （ EPQ ） and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory （ STAI ） were administered randomly to 262 undergraduate students. Results： （ 1 ） The item analysis showed except items 1 and 18, the others met psychometric criteria ; （ 2 ） Both the exploratory factor analysis （ The factor loading were respectively 0. 69 - 0. 83, 0. 59 - 0. 80, 0. 36 - 0. 59 and 0.41 - 0. 72 ） and confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the four-factor model represented a model of best fit （ RMSEA =0. 042, GFI =0. 926, AGFI =0. 902, IFI =0. 891, CFI =0. 887, AIC = 280. 349） . （3） BIS was moderately correlated with neuroficism （ r = 0. 53, P 〈 0. 01 ）, so was BASD with extraversion （r =0. 30, P 〈 0. 01） of EPQ. BIS was found to correlate with trait anxiety （r = 0.35, P 〈 0.01） . These data showed convergent and discriminate validities were good. （4） Cronbach＇s alphas for the BIS, BASRR, BASD and BASF were 0. 59, 0.72, 0.66 and 0.55 respectively. Conclusions： The BIS/BAS scale is relatively reliable and valid for personality constructs.